全文获取类型
收费全文 | 638篇 |
免费 | 14篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 1篇 |
2023年 | 1篇 |
2022年 | 3篇 |
2021年 | 9篇 |
2020年 | 21篇 |
2019年 | 47篇 |
2018年 | 43篇 |
2017年 | 53篇 |
2016年 | 42篇 |
2015年 | 25篇 |
2014年 | 25篇 |
2013年 | 113篇 |
2012年 | 35篇 |
2011年 | 44篇 |
2010年 | 22篇 |
2009年 | 19篇 |
2008年 | 26篇 |
2007年 | 27篇 |
2006年 | 17篇 |
2005年 | 12篇 |
2004年 | 7篇 |
2003年 | 8篇 |
2002年 | 25篇 |
2001年 | 6篇 |
2000年 | 10篇 |
1999年 | 5篇 |
1998年 | 3篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1996年 | 1篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有652条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
651.
Seán Donnelly 《Irish Studies Review》2019,27(4):493-511
ABSTRACTThe signing of the Anglo-Irish Treaty on 6 December 1921 was a watershed moment in modern Irish history. In addition to copper-fastening the partition of the island, the agreement catalysed the bifurcation of revolutionary Sinn Féin and set in train the processes that culminated, ultimately, in the outbreak of a bitter Civil War the following June. The events that led to the Treaty and the debates on it in Dáil Éireann have received extensive treatment from historians. However, scholars have paid far less attention to the impact of the Treaty on British politics; in particular, they have neglected to explore how the concession of limited Irish self-government impacted Britain’s national self-image at a time of crucial imperial adjustment following the Great War. This article will examine the range of arguments proffered for and against the Treaty in the House of Commons and the House of Lords and suggest that Parliamentary opposition to the settlement was underpinned by a sense of imperial-national feeling, one guided by an attitude of conscious superiority to non-British elements that can be understood productively as a form of British nationalism. 相似文献
652.
Judd KINZLEY 《Journal of Modern Chinese History》2019,13(1):169-188
ABSTRACTThis article argues that American and British narratives about the existence of a “stockpile” of Chinese goods had a powerful impact on US-China relations, China’s war effort, and China’s wartime everyday. Focusing on both the material and discursive construction of the so-called stockpile in the early 1940s, the work seeks to deconstruct a powerful symbol that was long used by both British and American officials (particularly in the US War Department) to delegitimize the Nationalist government’s war effort against Japan. Drawing on sources collected at archives in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Taiwan, the article seeks to rethink many commonly held assumptions about American aid and to reveal the powerful influence that the symbolic presence of the stockpile had in shaping Sino-American relations in the wartime period and beyond. 相似文献