治理理论与日本国立大学法人化

治理理论的核心,是改变传统管理方式下唯一权威中心的观念及行政调节的强制性手段,通过一些正式或非正式的制度安排,使不同的利益相关主体联合行动共同推进事物的发展。日本在本世纪初开始实施的国立大学法人化改革中,形成了政府适当放权、大学法人适当集权、社会力量适当参与的格局,法人化改革也是一次治理结构改革。日本国立大学治理结构改革的一些举措,对我国的公立大学具有一定的启示意义。     

中古及近代法制文献校释

前贤时彦在中古及近代法制献的整理方面做了大量辛勤工作,取得了丰硕的成果。但是,由于中古及近代法制献汗牛充栋,加之这些献充满大量的口语词以及法律专门词,所以,对其进行准确校释并非易事。直到目前,学们对这一时期的法制献进行误校和误释的现象还比较突出,这对于法制史和汉语史研究都是不利的。本拈出中古及近代法制献中“小愆乏及”、“恋着”、“细小”、“偏说”、“周备仪”、“不悔之人”、“科合”、“告反逮受”、“摄”、“连逮”、“奏尽”、“用类推迹”、“简书”、“分析申”、“水雨”、“便”、“画指为记”、“大例”、“捉”、“不在论限”、“逐要”、“没”、“虚说”、“父祖舍”等24个词语和术语,进行重新校释,以期得其正解。     

The Management of the Maritime Archaeological Heritage in the Bailiwick of Guernsey: a Case Study

Guernsey and the other islands in its Bailiwick have been visited and settled by people arriving by sea for thousands of years. Guernsey Museum manages the display and interpretation of this maritime heritage and, in conjunction with the Receiver of Wreck, administers the legal protection of historic wreck. Over the last 25 years a considerable amount of research has been undertaken on many aspects of the islands' maritime past. Museum displays and media presentations have been made to disseminate information about the islands' maritime archaeology to the wider world. This paper will highlight the various aspects of maritime archaeology in Guernsey and illustrate how Guernsey Museum manages this rich archaeological resource.
© 2004 The Nautical Archaeology Society     

论党依法执政的理论和实践

党的十六届四中全会提出了以依法执政、依法治国、执政为民、公平正义为主要内容的社会主义法治执政理论。这一执政理论的提出,标志着我们党对执政规律和建设中国特色社会主义的法治国家有了更加深刻的认识和把握。其执政方式不仅会引起党的领导体制和领导方式的深刻变革,而且将对我国依法行政产生深远影响。     

旅游企业的信用问题及其治理对策

本分析我国旅游企业的信用现状中存在的问题,并提出治理对策。     

我国旅游者合法权益保护问题的思考

随着旅游业在国民经济发展中的地位日益重要,旅游者合法权益保护问题也越发成为人们关注的焦点。本文探讨了旅游者合法权益保护的重要意义,对我国旅游者合法权益保护的现状进行了系统论述,对现阶段我国旅游者合法权益保护存在的主要问题及其成因做了深入分析。在此基础上,提出了旅游者合法权益保护系统的概念,尝试建立一种高效的旅游者合法权益保护系统模型。     

中国自然保护地立法模式探析

建立自然保护地是有效保护和合理利用自然资源的重要举措。法制建设是自然保护地建设和管理的重要基础与有力保障。自然保护地建设过程中发生的种种矛盾,归根到底是利益相关者之间的利益冲突,为此政府必须提供平衡各方利益的制度保障。中国现有的类型化部门立法与其他法律规范相结合的自然保护地立法模式存在立法层级低、法制协调性不足、立法体系封闭、保护对象不明确等缺陷。考虑到自然的整体性和调整利益冲突的有效性,我们应该选择综合性框架立法作为中国自然保护地立法的理想模式。     

Keep Burning Coal or the Manatee Gets It: Rendering the Carbon Economy Invisible through Endangered Species Protection

As ever expanding accretions of human industrial and residential development pave over endangered Florida manatees’ warm water springs winter habitat, more than half of the manatees have come to depend upon fossil fuel‐burning power plant hot water effluent channels for survival. In an effort to save these manatees, environmental activists have leveraged the US Endangered Species Act to protect the effluent streams and, by extension, have enshrined the power plants themselves as ecological saviors. This study interrogates the paradoxes within the resulting spatio‐legal regime. Recognizing the problematic human/nature binary at the heart of dominant Western practices, our study suggests spatial and legal regimes do not simply reify and reproduce this binary but also produce invisible ecocultural spaces that are essential to prop up an inherently unstable, illusory, and ultimately destructive definition of human existence.     

‘More Hateful because of its Hypocrisy’: Indians,Britain and Canadian Law in the Komagata Maru Incident of 1914

Recent remembrance and memorialisation of the Komagata Maru incident of 1914 has neglected the global and imperial implications of the incident, as well as the role that direct actions by the Indian passengers and Indians in Vancouver took against Canada’s discriminatory law. While the legal loss the passengers suffered could be regarded as simply tragic, the implications for the British Empire behind the Komagata Maru incident are more complex. More than just a legal battle between would-be Indian migrants and the Vancouver immigration authorities, the incident is a highly visible clash of two different understandings of the British imperial legal system. In contrast to any view that imperial harmony and the rights of all its subjects should supersede local concerns within the empire, Canadian immigration and legal officials instead viewed their rights as a self-governing dominion to make and pass their own laws (particularly around areas of racial desirability) as more important than issues of imperial membership, loyalty or harmony. The British government’s decision, in turn, not to contradict Canada’s eventual ruling against the Komagata Maru passengers and the decision to deport them, exposed the legal hierarchies of supposed imperial belonging, citizenship and ‘British liberty’ in the empire at a critical moment in the early twentieth century. What the incident highlighted, then, was an increasing legal distinction between settler colonies and colonies of exploitation within the empire.     

A Walk on the Wild Side with Yahweh: A Spatial Perspective on the Hebrew Deity in the National Epic

ABSTRACT

Although there is general agreement among biblical scholars that Chronicles developed an own historiography in contradistinction to the Deuteronomistic History, some scholars have started emphasizing the commonalities between these histories. The present contribution is an attempt to contribute to this investigation in Chronicles studies. The investigation particularly focuses on a disputed example from Chronicles, namely the legal reforms of King Jehoshaphat, in order to establish what the relationship is between Chronicles and the Deuteronomic legal traditions.