首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   91篇
  免费   0篇
  2023年   1篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   1篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   2篇
  2018年   5篇
  2017年   1篇
  2016年   2篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   2篇
  2013年   10篇
  2012年   6篇
  2011年   8篇
  2010年   7篇
  2009年   4篇
  2008年   7篇
  2007年   8篇
  2006年   6篇
  2005年   1篇
  2004年   9篇
  2003年   1篇
  2002年   4篇
  2001年   1篇
  1985年   1篇
排序方式: 共有91条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
91.
The extent to which the Unionist victory in the 'khaki' general election of 1900 was the result of patriotic sentiment arising from the South African war has long been a source of controversy among historians. Battersea has been cited as an area that was largely unaffected by patriotic and imperial fervour during this period. This article examines the general election campaign in the Battersea constituency. The sitting MP, John Burns, was re-elected despite his opposition to the war, but the Conservatives achieved their highest percentage vote of that at any parliamentary election between 1885 and 1918. While the war was not the only issue raised during the campaign, it was the most prominent and clearly benefited the imperialist and pro-war Conservative candidate. In order to retain his seat Burns had to fight a far more dynamic local campaign than his opponent, and even then he won only narrowly. Although imperial sentiment was not quite enough to oust Burns from this otherwise safe seat, it was the main reason for the strong Conservative performance.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号