长江三角洲城市入境旅游流区域内流动份额分析

该文运用模糊综合评判法与层次分析理论,结合长江三角洲城市旅游相关研究资料与研究成果,构建了长江三角洲某特定城市的入境旅游者对该区域其它城市旅游目的地选择的模糊综合评判矩阵。该文应用相应的模糊综合评判矩阵分别对上海、南京、杭州、苏州、无锡、宁波等长江三角洲6座城市的入境旅游者对该区域其它城市的旅游流份额进行了定量分析,并对这6座城市在长江三角洲的旅游流流动规律进行了定量分析与评价。     

中国文化遗产竞争力指标体系构建与测评

提升文化遗产竞争力,谋求中国在国际文化竞争中的话语权,无疑是当今国家文化建设面临的重大课题.本文从文化遗产生产力、文化遗产消费力、文化遗产支撑力、文化遗产传播力、文化遗产管理力以及文化遗产创新力六个方面构建中国文化遗产竞争力指标体系,在此基础上,结合主客观赋权法对文化遗产竞争力指标体系的权重进行综合确定,并对我国31个...     

旅游者饮食舒适度构成要素及影响机制研究

旅游者饮食舒适度对旅游消费体验具有重要影响。文章基于访谈资料,运用扎根理论方法,探索识别饮食舒适度的构成要素及其影响机制。结论表明：①旅游者饮食舒适度是旅游者在饮食活动中,对宏观环境、微观氛围和美食产生心理、生理相互协调的综合评价,包含9个主范畴、26个次范畴和60个概念。②旅游者饮食舒适度由环境基础、氛围营造、感知实体和感知主体4个要素构成,环境基础、氛围营造和感知实体由感知主体进行主客观串联。③旅游者饮食舒适度存在舒适唤起、舒适实现和舒适评价三个阶段,不同阶段的影响因素存在差异,并综合影响旅游者饮食舒适体验。文章丰富了旅游饮食消费和舒适度的研究领域,为促进地方餐饮发展和提升旅游者饮食满意度提供理论借鉴。     

以田野考古为主探索夏文化已经取得硕果——纪念徐旭生先生赴豫西考古调查"夏墟"49周年

本文回顾了几十年来探索夏文化、早商文化的历程及突破,并对学术研究中存在的一些问题进行了讨论,指出学术研究要遵守实事求是的原则.     

交通路网中心性对土地利用强度的影响研究——以青岛市中心城区为例

采取青岛市交通路网矢量数据和 POI 数据，综合运用核密度估计法、地理加权回归模型和多中心性评价模型，从中心性角度解析了青岛市中心城区交通路网与土地利用强度的相关关系。研究表明：青岛市中心城区交通路网的临近中心性与直线中心性结构呈现“中心—外围”模式，中介中心性具有显著的点轴模式；商业、公共服务以及居住用地布局均呈现多中心结构；交通路网中心性与土地利用强度具有较强的相关性且相关关系具有空间异质性；商业用地和公共服务用地与交通路网中心性的相关性高于居住用地。研究揭示了交通路网与土地利用强度之间具有较强的依赖性，为城市规划提供可靠的理论依据，有助于进一步优化城市空间布局。     

基于空间均衡视角的区域高质量发展内涵界定与状态评价——以陕西省为例

本文构建了区域高质量发展的空间均衡度与空间均衡发展度两个指标，衡量了2017年陕西10个地级市的区域高质量发展水平。结论如下：①陕西经济发展质量呈西安与榆林“两极驱动”的空间格局；社会发展质量呈“中心化”发展空间格局；资源环境发展质量呈南高北低的空间格局。②空间均衡视角下，陕西高质量发展呈现以西安为增长极，西安以东以南地区空间均衡发展度低，西安以西以北地区空间均衡发展度高的空间格局。在发展意义上能达到空间均衡状态的只有西安，其他地级市均处于不同程度失衡状态。     

略论魏晋玄学的“自觉”前奏

学术与道德自觉一方面使汉魏士人渐趋性灵自觉，另一方面也使他们复归于道家传统，并现实化为自身的玄思理路和放达的朝朝暮暮。     

Place,candidate roots,and voter preferences in an age of partisan polarization: Observational and experimental evidence

Throughout the mid-twentieth century, scholars identified considerable contextual variation in American electoral politics. Party platforms varied significantly across the country, split ticket voting was commonplace, and candidate idiosyncrasies appeared to matter a great deal to voters. According to previous research, candidates' roots seemed especially important to voters, with “homegrown” candidates enjoying a boost at the polls. There is good reason to expect, however, that voters may no longer care about candidate roots. Partisan politics have polarized, both ideologically amongst elites and “affectively” amongst the electorate, continually since the mid-1990s (Mason, 2018). In addition, recent work suggests that American political behavior has “nationalized; ” meaning that national level partisan cues dominate voters' decision calculus, from presidential to mayoral races (Hopkins 2018). Both trends suggest little to no role for apolitical candidate characteristics to factor into voters' evaluations of candidates. To reassess voters’ appetite for homegrown candidates, this paper features observational and conjoint experimental studies designed to discern whether individuals in the United States still care about candidate roots. Results indicate that, despite trends of partisan polarization and nationalization, voters continue to consider candidate roots important. Furthermore, this preference appears especially strong among those with a strong place identity, suggesting that those for whom geographical identity is most important are particularly sensitive to geographical cues.     

No proxy for quality: why journal rankings in political science are problematic for political theory research

ABSTRACT

Journal rankings for political science have been regularly published, from the 1970s onwards, by the American Political Science Association’s ‘state of the discipline’ journal. Politics journals have also been officially ranked by the Australian Political Studies Association into four bands (A*, A, B and C) from 2007 onwards. This article shows, first, that the assumption grounding these exercises (namely, that disciplinary journal rankings can serve as proxies for the quality of articles in their pages) is undermined by the findings of the broader research evaluation literature, especially with respect to sub-disciplines (like political theory, Australian politics, and some types of qualitative comparative politics) that bear certain characteristics. Next, outlining the findings of a 2018 survey, it is argued that the disciplinary use of journal rankings in political studies not only has damaging effects on research in political theory, but also advantages other sub-disciplines. The paper closes with two recommendations.     

国外旅游绩效评估方法研究进展与启示

目前很少有研究系统梳理旅游绩效评估方法。本文通过梳理国外代表性文献，着重比较4类评估方法，并提出未来研究的重点方向，以期为相关研究提供理论参考与技术支持。结果发现：①4类方法分别具有特定的理论视角、固有的假设约束、严格的技术规则和明确的适用范围，未来应基于“传统绩效—技术效率—生产率—竞争力”的研究框架，针对性地评估和调控旅游企业、行业与目的地绩效；②应严格遵循模型方法的技术规则，规避技术陷阱，并从提高数据质量、优化遴选指标和扩展模型方法等方面优化评估技术，提升理论贡献；③应重点关注全球化、技术变革、可持续发展背景下的旅游绩效应用研究，在内外部因素及其交互作用中“解构”绩效评估，提升实践价值。