大雁塔和法门寺砖材保护研究

大雁塔和法门寺塔这两座佛教名塔都表现出明显的风化现象,需要及时的给于保护。通过X-射线衍射分析、岩相显微镜分析及孔隙度的测定,分析了大雁塔和法门寺两座佛教名塔的风化特征。在此基础上,用几种不同的加固保护剂对两种砖材进行加固保护研究。通过渗透深度、孔隙度、毛细吸水和毛细渗透、持水量、透气性、水力学膨胀、等温吸附、抗压强度及酸腐蚀、冻融、热膨胀之后的强度衰减等参数分析,结果表明含氟聚合物对两种砖材具有良好的加固保护效果。     

论杰斐逊在种族奴隶制问题上的困境

在面临由自己设定的种族界线时,杰斐逊天赋权利信条的普遍性受到了其人种特殊性观念的挑战,同时天赋权利也面临着与财产权观念的协调性问题。对此,他试图以一种两全其美的移民方式解决潜在的矛盾;当形势发生变化时,杰斐逊就从贯彻理想的目标撤退,被迫听命于本阶级利益的自然律令。     

从英国农业现代化的历程看中国入世后农村土地问题的走向

中国是一个农业大国,但农业却是中国的弱质产业。入世,犹如一把双刃剑,在给中国带来机遇的同时,也带来了严重的挑战。本从中英农业转型的比较入手,认为土地产权的完善是中国经济全球化以后农业面临的一项迫切任务,并提出了一些政策性建议。     

近代江南乡村妇女的"财产权"

在近代江南乡村,尽管妇女对家庭生计有着重要的贡献,但家产的男系传承原则使她们基本上没有财产权可言。在家庭结构健全的场合,妇女根本就无权获得家产份额。寡妇相对而言有一定的家产处置权,但那仅仅是代儿孙监管而已,在寡妇无子的情况下,还要将家产捐给族里。出嫁女获赠“奁田”,娘家有随时收回的权利。因此,妇女的所谓“财产权”是残缺的,在家族共财制的农业社会的历史场境中,这是很容易解释的。     

唐宋时期寡妇的家产权益与生存处境

By investigating the Tang-Song examples of widows remaining chastity or inviting a jiejiaofu (second husband) into the deceased husbands’ families, this article analyzes widows’ lives and their right to inherit their deceased husbands’ family properties. The conclusion is that widows had only “rights of management,” but not the “possessive right,” over their deceased husbands’ properties. Moreover, the qualities of widows’ lives in their in-law’s families depended on their relationships with the deceased husbands’ brothers. When being treated unfairly, widows often resorted to “the power of the maternal uncle” in order to defend their benefits. Translated into English by Yang Kai-chien     

试析汝窑的性质及相关问题

汝窑自1986年在宝丰清凉寺发现以来,经过八次考古发掘终于取得了中国陶瓷史上的重大突破,找到并确定了汝官窑瓷器的烧造区.本文根据考古发掘资料和文献史料记载,结合宝丰的历史沿革,认为汝窑的性质是官窑,其烧制宫廷用瓷时间约在宋哲宗元祐元年至徽宗宣和末年.张公巷窑址应为金元时期的仿汝窑址.     

Private rental investment and socio-spatial disadvantage in Sydney,Australia

This article unpacks the connection between a growing cohort of small-scale but purposive property investors and urban socio-spatial restructuring. We analyse private rental housing as a tenure share to demonstrate its spatial correlation with the suburbanisation of socio-economic disadvantage in Sydney, Australia, between 1991 and 2016. Then, we show how investors drive this emerging pattern by reference to the geography of property owners’ stated investment objectives—low capital outlay, rental yields, and capital growth prospects. We contend that the link between their small-scale activities and the city’s changing socio-spatial structure is an overlooked consequence of private rental sector (PRS) housing financialisation. Importantly, our focus on behaviours exhibited by small-scale rental property owners in PRS financialisation transcends existing analyses that have concentrated on corporate entity activity in this space. That focus also contrasts with framings of private rental growth as a residual outcome of developments elsewhere in the housing market. Such work is significant because it demonstrates the impacts of real estate investment on urban form.     

The Political Economy of Housing Investment in the Short-Term Rental Market: Insights from Urban Portugal

Short-term rentals (STRs) emerged as holiday accommodations, disrupting the hospitality industry in the decade before COVID-19. Mainstream explanations for their growth revolved around digital tourism platforms like Airbnb as market disruptors and the sharing economy rationale. At the same time, critical scholars explored the capitalisation of greater rent gaps in urban central locations. However, these explanations are insufficient to explain the growth of STRs. We supplement them by building bridges between the urban political economy and the geographies of financialisation through the cases of Lisbon and Porto before the pandemic. The paper focuses on tourism-induced housing investment, taking a closer look at the profile of investors in association with STR property managers in the context of the late-entrepreneurial urban regime. We conclude that tourism development has allowed opportunities for housing financialisation through STR professionalisation, enhancing the allocation of interest-bearing capital in tourism-oriented real estate.     

From historical chains to derivative futures: Title registries as time machines

For centuries, transferring ownership of land under common law was a slow, complex process requiring the construction of a chain of paper deeds evidencing multiple decades of prior possession. In 1858, colonist Robert Torrens developed a new system for the transfer of land in South Australia, where the land was understood by colonial powers as ‘new’ and without history. With the intention of making land a liquid asset, Torrens’ system of title registration shifted the legal basis of title from a history of prior possession to a singular act of registration. Analysing the structure and effects of title registration, engaging with interdisciplinary work on time, and taking H.G Wells’ iconic time travel novella as a point of departure, I argue that title registries can usefully be understood as time machines. Like the machine H.G Wells imagined, title registries use fiction to facilitate fantastical journeys in which the subject is radically temporally dislocated from the material constraints of history. As with time machines, it tends to be a transcendental white male subject who is most likely to survive this dislocation. While based on fiction, the impacts of title registries are very much real, facilitating humanity’s arrival at racist, dystopic landscapes in the here and now.