全文获取类型
收费全文 | 431篇 |
免费 | 18篇 |
专业分类
449篇 |
出版年
2022年 | 5篇 |
2020年 | 8篇 |
2019年 | 16篇 |
2018年 | 16篇 |
2017年 | 24篇 |
2016年 | 24篇 |
2015年 | 18篇 |
2014年 | 13篇 |
2013年 | 109篇 |
2012年 | 19篇 |
2011年 | 8篇 |
2010年 | 14篇 |
2009年 | 11篇 |
2008年 | 12篇 |
2007年 | 9篇 |
2006年 | 11篇 |
2005年 | 9篇 |
2004年 | 8篇 |
2003年 | 5篇 |
2002年 | 4篇 |
2001年 | 11篇 |
2000年 | 5篇 |
1999年 | 8篇 |
1998年 | 4篇 |
1997年 | 7篇 |
1996年 | 8篇 |
1995年 | 11篇 |
1994年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 3篇 |
1992年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1990年 | 2篇 |
1989年 | 2篇 |
1986年 | 2篇 |
1983年 | 3篇 |
1982年 | 2篇 |
1980年 | 3篇 |
1979年 | 4篇 |
1978年 | 2篇 |
1977年 | 1篇 |
1976年 | 3篇 |
1973年 | 1篇 |
1972年 | 2篇 |
1971年 | 2篇 |
1970年 | 2篇 |
1969年 | 2篇 |
1967年 | 1篇 |
1966年 | 1篇 |
1965年 | 1篇 |
1950年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有449条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
161.
Azurduya gen. nov. (Brachiopoda: Camarotoechiidae) is described from Early Carboniferous sequences in the Argentine Precordillera and northern Chile. Marine assemblages and the palynoflora associated with this genus suggest a Tournaisian age. The type species Azurduya chavelensis (Amos, 1958) is reviewed and redescribed from material from the type locality. Additional material from equivalent localities in the Rio Blanco Basin (La Rioja and San Juan provinces, Argentine Precordilera) has been used to understand ontogenetic changes as well intraspecific variation. Azurduya cingolanii sp. nov. is proposed. 相似文献
162.
163.
164.
During the tumultuous time of financial and colonial expansion between 1825 and 1855, both Charles Dickens and John Galt published picaresque novels depicting transatlantic travel and land speculation. If emigration is the act of permanently leaving one's homeland and living in another, then neither novels' eponymous protagonist Martin Chuzzlewit nor Lawrie Todd is an emigrant. By reading Martin Chuzzlewit (1843–44) and John Galt's Lawrie Todd (1830) alongside nineteenth-century developments of the geo-political and financial spheres, this article shows how these works form a counter-narrative to traditional novels of emigration. Both protagonists leave Britain with the explicit intent to seek their fortune in America through engagement with land speculation companies. Though the characters' experiences of transatlantic financial speculation is dichotomous (with Todd becoming rich and Chuzzlewit losing all he has), both characters ultimately return to Britain. In these counter-narratives, we argue that America is deployed as Britain's financial periphery, rather than an alternative imperial centre, working to entrench British nationalism through transatlantic financial speculation. It is through the act of returning from America that Dickens and Galt counter typified emigration narratives that represent the choice to emigrate to America as synonymous with abandoning the Empire for the ‘Great Republic’. Instead, Dickens and Galt show how America can be exploited as a financial extension of Empire where Britons can maintain national loyalty while simultaneously responding to an unstable global financial market that was increasingly dependent upon speculation and foreign investment practices. 相似文献
165.
Carl Eric Scott 《Perspectives on Political Science》2013,42(2):131-138
166.
167.
H. M. Scott 《国际历史评论》2013,35(4):941-944
JOHN HARDMAN and MUNRO PRICE, eds. Louis XVI and the comte de Vergennes: Correspondence, 1774–1787. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1999. Pp. xvii, 403. £65.00. Reviewed by H. M. Scott 相似文献
168.
169.
Scott C. Jones 《SJOT: Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament》2013,27(1):81-90
ABSTRACTMartin Luther’s comments in a section of Table Talk continue to be used as evidence that he denied the Solomonic authorship of Ecclesiastes. A comparison of the passage with Luther’s “Preface” to Jesus Sirach demonstrates that the majority of Luther’s comments in that section of Table Talk pertain to Sirach. However, the passage also has clear parallels in Luther’s “Preface to Solomon’s ‘The Preacher,’” suggesting that it is a mixture of Luther’s comments on Ecclesiastes and Sirach. The portions of Table Talk which do pertain to Ecclesiastes have commonly been misinterpreted. Luther does not deny that Solomon was the author of Ecclesiastes; he denies that Solomon was the scribe. He thought that Ecclesiastes was written down by students on the basis of the oral teachings of their master, much like his own Table Talk. 相似文献
170.