首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1416篇
  免费   55篇
  2023年   8篇
  2022年   6篇
  2021年   7篇
  2020年   25篇
  2019年   46篇
  2018年   44篇
  2017年   60篇
  2016年   51篇
  2015年   25篇
  2014年   45篇
  2013年   442篇
  2012年   36篇
  2011年   42篇
  2010年   36篇
  2009年   33篇
  2008年   28篇
  2007年   30篇
  2006年   24篇
  2005年   23篇
  2004年   30篇
  2003年   33篇
  2002年   25篇
  2001年   25篇
  2000年   22篇
  1999年   22篇
  1998年   12篇
  1997年   24篇
  1996年   12篇
  1995年   20篇
  1994年   15篇
  1993年   15篇
  1991年   6篇
  1990年   11篇
  1989年   6篇
  1988年   9篇
  1987年   5篇
  1986年   11篇
  1985年   8篇
  1984年   17篇
  1983年   13篇
  1982年   17篇
  1981年   11篇
  1980年   5篇
  1979年   9篇
  1978年   9篇
  1977年   9篇
  1976年   8篇
  1975年   8篇
  1974年   5篇
  1969年   4篇
排序方式: 共有1471条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
121.
This article reviews the state of the two security and defence institutions available to west Europeans: NATO and the EU's common European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). In each case, the authors assess the political maturity and stability of the institution, and then ask what it can contribute in terms of coordinated military capability to west European's strategic readiness. NATO's Prague summit in November 2002 will address the thorny issue of the next tranche of post–Cold War enlargement. But beyond the predictable debate about which candidates to admit, and what should be offered to those unsuccessful in their bid, there will be a far more urgent and important agenda to be discussed at Prague—the military capabilities of the European allies. Given that ESDP is still far from achieving its capability goals, the authors argue that the time is right for European allies to begin thinking in terms of generating a composite, joint strike force which could be configured to be interoperable with US forces and which could salvage something useful from the disheartening lack of progress in developing a European military capability.  相似文献   
122.
This article examines how the British government has responded to Zimbabwe’s ongoing crisis. This case raises several wider issues for British foreign policy, most notably the question of how much leverage London can exercise on the international scene in general, and over relatively small and weak states like Zimbabwe in particular. Zimbabwe’s crisis also raises profound questions about the appropriate balance between bilateral and multilateral policies, and between engaging in public criticism and conducting so–called ‘quiet diplomacy’. While bilateralism clearly has not worked, multilateralism has revealed its own frustrations, especially given the reluctance of many African elites within a number of organizations to criticize President Mugabe’s policies. This reluctance threatens to unravel the British Labour government’s stated objectives in Africa while at the same time raising important doubts over the credibility of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), and whether an ‘Africa moment’ can be discerned in the manner articulated by prime minister Tony Blair.  相似文献   
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
As our two founding editors write in this issue, at its inception,German History fulfilled a dual purpose. First, it arose fromthe need to find a ‘home’ for a growing body ofscholarship on German history produced and debated in the UnitedKingdom, not least under the aegis of the German History Society.Second, the journal was set up with a certain sense of mission,designed to showcase an innovative brand of German history writing,which was at variance, to some extent at least, with that predominantlypublished in the American-based Central European History. Sincethen, much has changed.  相似文献   
129.
130.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号