排序方式: 共有27条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
21.
22.
23.
House societies have become popular with archaeologists in recent years, due to (among other things) their conspicuous material basis (wealth, heirlooms and the houses themselves). As yet, however, most archaeological studies have focused only on individual societies. In this article, we offer a comparative and long-term approach to the phenomenon, using as case studies the Bronze Age and Iron Age communities of the Levant, the Aegean and the central Mediterranean. We describe the elements that define them as house societies and examine their evolution through time. We follow a strictly Lévi-Straussian definition of the house that prevents the concept from losing heuristic power. Using this definition, we consider that houses are to be found in ranked societies without centralization and in complex agropastoral systems, like those of the Mediterranean, where agricultural soil is scarce and liable to be monopolized. We argue that the house emerges in these competitive contexts as an institution to control land and retain patrimony undivided. Through a combination of archaeological and written sources, we try to demonstrate that it is possible to document several strategies used by house societies to acquire and retain power and wealth, including dowry, levirate, a bilateral system of marriage alliances, ancestor cults, specific architectures and house treasures. The case studies addressed here offer good comparative material for assessing similar processes elsewhere. At the same time, we argue that the Mediterranean area developed a particular ideology, that of the shepherd ruler, that was essential to legitimate the house. 相似文献
24.
25.
Adriana Bernardes Adriano Zerbini Cilene Gomes Edison Bicudo Eliza Almeida Flavia Betioli Contel Flávia Grimm Gustavo Nobre Lídia Antongiovanni Maria Bueno Pinheiro Marcos Xavier María Laura Silveria Marina Montenegro Marisa Ferreira da Rocha Milton Santos Mónica Arroyo Paula Borin Soraia Ramos Vanir de Lima Belo 《对极》2017,49(4):952-958
26.
27.