首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   111篇
  免费   4篇
  2023年   1篇
  2021年   1篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   6篇
  2018年   3篇
  2017年   7篇
  2016年   4篇
  2015年   5篇
  2014年   3篇
  2013年   38篇
  2012年   3篇
  2011年   2篇
  2009年   4篇
  2008年   2篇
  2006年   3篇
  2005年   1篇
  2004年   1篇
  2003年   2篇
  2002年   1篇
  2001年   3篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1989年   2篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   3篇
  1984年   2篇
  1983年   3篇
  1982年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1975年   1篇
  1972年   1篇
  1953年   1篇
  1952年   1篇
  1949年   1篇
  1948年   1篇
排序方式: 共有115条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
61.
This paper develops geographical work that is attentive to, and critical of, how safety is lived and narrated. In contrast to previous work on safety that focuses on fear, the paper looks at safety as something more than aspiration for women. To do so, the paper utilises the metaphor of the “expatriate bubble” to explore how safety is constructed and experienced by privileged migrants in Singapore. Utilising research from two projects, we argue that we need to think about how gender and Othering intersect to construct safety. In doing so, we explore how we can use conceptualisations of privileged migrants to research how safety can be understood and therefore practised more widely.  相似文献   
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
Abstract

European spatial planning arguments advocate a blend of strategic thinking, coordination and related initiatives to promote and secure territorial cohesion. These ambitions embrace a set of normative agendas around economic, social and environmental convergence, competitiveness, policy coordination and efficient infrastructure provision across space. In practice, territorial management then involves devising interventions across inter-connecting scales of governance which comprise complex agency relations, differentiated places and defined communities. In transnational contexts, attempts to foster appropriate spatial governance arrangements and relations across sovereign borders necessitate re-crafting planning and development cultures and service delivery practices to advance territorial cohesion. Transnational working necessarily involves cooperation across an extended range of institutions, interests, influences and potential actors. This paper examines attempts to secure bi-lateral commitment to a joint planning framework for the two distinct territories on the island of Ireland. Specifically, it traces the formal and informal activities involved in the development of the 2013 Framework for Cooperation between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland. Informed by ideas of cross-border regionalism, it discusses the necessary spatial public diplomacy involved in the social reconstruction of strategic spatial planning to improve policy coordination and cross-border working.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号