首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   162篇
  免费   8篇
  2024年   1篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   4篇
  2021年   4篇
  2020年   8篇
  2019年   13篇
  2018年   12篇
  2017年   14篇
  2016年   9篇
  2015年   6篇
  2014年   6篇
  2013年   24篇
  2012年   9篇
  2011年   4篇
  2010年   6篇
  2009年   7篇
  2008年   6篇
  2007年   2篇
  2006年   4篇
  2005年   3篇
  2004年   2篇
  2003年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
  2001年   3篇
  2000年   4篇
  1999年   2篇
  1997年   2篇
  1996年   1篇
  1994年   2篇
  1992年   2篇
  1991年   1篇
  1990年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1977年   1篇
排序方式: 共有170条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
ABSTRACT

This article examines over 7,500 beads from eight Native archaeological sites located in the lower Potomac River valley in order to understand how changes in bead assemblages between AD 1300 and 1712 expressed an ever-evolving Chesapeake cultural landscape. This analysis demonstrates clear differences in the types and distributions of beads from mortuary and domestic/nonmortuary contexts. Ossuary contexts contained the highest frequency of beads with the number of beads increasing over time. Following the arrival of English settlers in the 1620s, glass beads begin to appear in ossuary contexts. Beads from domestic or nonmortuary contexts are fewer in number, and those present were manufactured using local materials, including bone and clay, as well as shell. However, after 1680, there is a shift from shell beads being predominate on Native sites, to sites containing exclusively glass beads, red and black glass beads in particular. Post-1680 sites appear to reflect Piscataway displacement and the disruption of indigenous trade routes, leading Natives to obtain beads from colonial vendors. The distribution of bead color, an important attribute for communicating Native states of being, also shifts after 1680, with assemblages once dominated by white shell beads now dominated by black and red glass beads.  相似文献   
156.
157.
158.
ABSTRACT

At the first ever worldwide international conference of psychology in Paris, 1889, one symposium included a round-table event devoted entirely to the neurodevelopmental condition of synesthesia. Details of this seminal gathering on synesthesia and its international reception have been lost to historical obscurity. A synesthesia study committee emerged from this meeting, as well as a new research tool. Moreover, the scientific findings discussed during this symposium would be echoed over a hundred years later, when a new wave of synesthesia research in the late-twentieth century arose. This article sheds new light on this seminal gathering and aims to answer the following historical questions: Why was synesthesia included in this conference? What science was discussed? Who were the members of the committee and how did they come to be involved? What were their contributions to synesthesia research before, during, and after the conference? What has history shown us about the impact of this symposium on the science of synesthesia?  相似文献   
159.
160.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号