首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   61篇
  免费   2篇
  2017年   3篇
  2015年   2篇
  2014年   3篇
  2013年   27篇
  2012年   1篇
  2010年   1篇
  2007年   2篇
  2006年   2篇
  2005年   1篇
  2002年   2篇
  2001年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   1篇
  1997年   1篇
  1987年   1篇
  1986年   1篇
  1985年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1977年   1篇
  1976年   1篇
  1974年   1篇
  1973年   2篇
  1971年   1篇
  1970年   1篇
  1963年   1篇
  1959年   1篇
排序方式: 共有63条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
41.
Abstract

Communitarians have expressed deep suspicion over the burgeoning project of human biological enhancement. This is hardly surprising because the best defenses of enhancement have largely treaded on libertarian-consequentialist grounds; they have ignored sentiments that communitarians prize most: features like love, care, belongingness, and solidarity. But defenses of enhancement need not necessarily rely on the liberal image of moral agents; it is possible to defend even evasive biological alterations in ways congenial to communitarian sympathies. The sentiments are elusive things, and they invariably motivate human action in often surprising and unobvious ways. Looking to the history of political thought, a close read of Adam Smith reveals that he defended technological artifice as a means to protect the human propensities toward love and belongingness.  相似文献   
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
China is moving ahead with the Silk Road Economic Belt, an ambitious infrastructure development agenda with the distinct promise of regional and sub-regional economic development. However, the initiative will create new environmental risks across the entire Eurasian continent, especially in countries with predominately poor records of environmental governance, including the former Soviet republics and Russia. Concurrently, on the domestic front, the Chinese Government has launched a new policy paradigm, “ecological civilization,” to dramatically improve environmental regulations, reduce pollution, and transform industries by adopting new green technologies and higher environmental standards. But does China’s intention to go through a “green shift” domestically resonate with these new transborder infrastructure development mega-projects? This paper will attempt to answer this question by juxtaposing China’s new domestic policy paradigm with environmental standards currently proposed in its global outreach projects focusing on China-northern Eurasia and China-Russia, including trade exchanges in natural resources.  相似文献   
50.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号