全文获取类型
收费全文 | 217篇 |
免费 | 11篇 |
出版年
2021年 | 1篇 |
2020年 | 1篇 |
2019年 | 2篇 |
2018年 | 5篇 |
2017年 | 12篇 |
2016年 | 7篇 |
2015年 | 1篇 |
2014年 | 3篇 |
2013年 | 74篇 |
2012年 | 7篇 |
2011年 | 5篇 |
2010年 | 5篇 |
2009年 | 4篇 |
2008年 | 4篇 |
2007年 | 5篇 |
2006年 | 3篇 |
2005年 | 3篇 |
2004年 | 1篇 |
2003年 | 4篇 |
2002年 | 7篇 |
2001年 | 3篇 |
2000年 | 2篇 |
1999年 | 1篇 |
1998年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1996年 | 3篇 |
1994年 | 3篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1990年 | 4篇 |
1989年 | 6篇 |
1987年 | 1篇 |
1986年 | 4篇 |
1985年 | 4篇 |
1984年 | 2篇 |
1983年 | 2篇 |
1982年 | 3篇 |
1981年 | 1篇 |
1980年 | 5篇 |
1979年 | 2篇 |
1978年 | 3篇 |
1977年 | 3篇 |
1976年 | 3篇 |
1975年 | 3篇 |
1974年 | 3篇 |
1973年 | 1篇 |
1972年 | 2篇 |
1971年 | 1篇 |
1970年 | 2篇 |
1968年 | 2篇 |
排序方式: 共有228条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
201.
The lectures on American pragmatism given by the French sociologist Emile Durkheim in 1913 in Paris were first published in French in 1955 and finally translated into English and published in 1983 as Pragmatism and Sociology. For obvious reasons they have attracted considerable attention from philosophers and sociologists, especially the latter, in both continental Europe and the English speaking world. Durkheim's motives in giving the lectures have been scrutinized, his interpretations of the pragmatists widely discussed and his criticisms of William James, John Dewey, and F. S. C. Schiller have met with mixed receptions. However, after years of scholarly discourse on his motives, interpretations and criticisms, there is no common agreement on the significance and meaning of Pragmatism and Sociology. We briefly address the disagreement over Durkheim's motives in the introductory section before turning to our interpretation in the body of the article. There we focus on his criticisms of the pragmatists’ views on the aims and nature of knowledge, which is a classic confrontation between French rationalism à la Durkheim and American pragmatism of the James/Dewey variant. 相似文献
202.
Amanda Dennis 《European Legacy》2011,16(4):469-485
Pairing Thus Spoke Zarathustra with On the Genealogy of Morality foregrounds tensions between artistic creation and critical interpretation in Nietzsche's work. From The Birth of Tragedy to his genesis of the concept, Will to Power, Nietzsche describes the real, or “what is,” in terms of a creative, form-giving force. We might therefore read Zarathustra—a linguistically experimental, richly allegorical, self-reflexive, modernist prose poem—as the pre-eminent, artistic mode of philosophical expression, at least for Nietzsche. But Zarathustra is followed by a sober Abhandlung (treatise), which professes a scientific goal of “getting to the bottom of things” by uncovering the contingency, origin, and fabricated nature of supposedly eternal, “given” values. These instantiations of Nietzsche-the-artist and Nietzsche-the-critic suggest art's “double” or contradictory nature—a nature that accents its kinship with philosophy. Zarathustra and the Genealogy, read together, hint that the destruction of idols—or de-constructive, critical interpretation more generally—is not just supplemental to, but a necessary moment within the aesthetic itself. 相似文献
203.
204.
Dennis R. Mills 《Journal of Historical Geography》1978,4(3):265-276
This study examines kinship networks in a Cambridgeshire village, Melbourn, in 1841, using evidence derived from the census of that year. It focuses on the measurement and exploration of the residential propinquity of kin as a contribution to research on the historical geography of mobility and segregation in nineteenth-century society. 相似文献
205.
206.
207.
208.
209.
210.