大云山汉墓出土漆纱研究兼论楚系漆纱冠

通过对江苏盱眙大云山汉墓出土漆纱残片的科学分析,可以得知该漆纱残片内部的使用材料为桑蚕丝,其外再髹大漆;编织结构为典型经编纂组结构;其表面可装饰红色朱砂矿物颜料。楚、汉这一类漆纱冠情况概基本如此。同时,结合以往考古材料和文献记载,可以推测漆纱冠这一形制,或起源于楚国,并沿用至汉及后世。     

生态博物馆建设中的三种关系辨析

生态博物馆是一种理念和过程,而不是一种模式和结果,它需要在冲突实践中不断发展.社区民众作为生态博物馆建设的真正主体的地位尚未完全确立、博物馆建设中的文化保护功能还没有充分体现、经济因素考量与人文关怀在建设中还存在一些不和谐的表现,这是当前中国生态博物馆建设中出现的主要矛盾.因而,唤起社区民众的文化自觉和文化自信,凸显社区民众在生态博物馆建设中的主体性地位;加强对社区文化的挖掘、整理和实时保存,对现有珍贵文化遗产的静态保护与活态传承;在生态博物馆社区旅游开发中,保存博物馆建设固有的人文价值,成为当今中国生态博物馆建设中的重中之重.     

Imperial power, gentry power and clan power: Western and Chinese cultural traditions in a comparative perspective

The differences between China and Western countries in human and physical environment has brought about two distinctive models of state. In the Chinese-style state of quasi-consanguinity, in which family and state have a similar structure, imperial power, gentry power, and clan power are the product of common ownership of consanguineous groups. The similarity in the structures of these three kinds of power derives from the fact that they are all restricted by the power of lineage generated from the self-sufficient small farmer economy, and must obey the conventions of ancestors which hold the benefits of the group as supreme. The relationship between these three kinds of power, is definitely not the one that is based on the division of power that is founded on individual private ownership in Western countries, where ‘public power’ and ‘individual private ownership’ are antithetic, but are three aspects of the patriarchal dictatorship that complement each other. Therefore, village rule in China and autonomy in the West are two totally different concepts, and gentry power is also not the ‘authorized power’ from the state. __________ Translated from the Journal of Tianjin Normal University, 2004: 1     

(Homo)sex in the City Only? Finding Continuity and Change in the Gay Past

Books reviewed in this article: Glenn Burger and Steven F. Kruger (eds), Queering the Middle Ages John Howard, Men Like That: A Southern Queer History Stephen O. Murray, Homosexualities     

Phytolith-rich layers from the Late Bronze and Iron Ages at Tel Dor (Israel): mode of formation and archaeological significance

The presence of many phytolith-rich layers in late Bronze and Iron Age deposits at Tel Dor, Israel, are indicative of specific locations where plants were concentrated. Detailed studies of six of these phytolith-rich layers and associated sediments from Tel Dor show that the phytoliths were derived mainly from wild and domestic grasses. The most common domestic grass was the cereal Triticum aestivum (bread wheat). Three of these layers have a microlaminated microstructure, associated dung spherulites and phosphate nodules; characteristics that all point to the phytolith-rich layers having formed from dung in animal enclosures. In two of the layers, the microlaminated structure is absent while dung spherulites and phosphate nodules are present, suggesting that these too originate from dung that was not deposited in an enclosure. The sixth layer is microlaminated but does not contain spherulites. We thus cannot suggest a parsimonious explanation of its observed properties. Concentrations of burnt phytoliths are present in three locations, implying that dung was either burnt in situ or the ashes from burnt dung were redeposited. The transformation of dung accumulations into phytolith-rich layers involves a loss of organic material and hence a significant reduction in sediment volume, which is clearly apparent in the stratigraphy of some of the locations examined. The volume reduction can be observed in the macrostratigraphy and has important implications with regard to macrostratigraphic interpretation. The presence of abundant phytolith-rich layers on the tell has significant implications for the concept of ‘urbanism’ during these periods.