满族文化传播产业化发展探析

满族文化经过漫长的历史变迁发展到今天,人们对它还有多少认识取决于对满族文化的宣传力度.满族文化的传播,不仅对大众了解这一民族意义重大,对整个中华民族的文化发掘也有着巨大的现实意义.在当今时代,满族文化传播产业化,不仅对弘扬满族文化可以收到良好效果,同时也会促进其他相关产业的发展.本文探讨了满族文化传播产业化发展的意义,分析了目前的现状,并对今后满族文化传播产业化发展提出了可行性对策和意见.     

漕控与清代地方社会秩序——以匡光文控漕事件为中心的考察

The cases of caozheng 漕政 (The government administration of the collection and transport of grain taxes by water in the former times) are present in all stages in the Qing Dynasty. The social interaction and interest dispute involve the commoners, officials, and gentries in the localities in all kinds of caozheng cases. Caozheng cases that are inspired by lofty motives and filed under the established procedure are often mingled with trumped-up charges that are pressed through illegitimate means. They are employed as conventional methods by both commoners and officials for their own interests. By virtue of an in-depth analysis of such representative cases as the lawsuit issued by Kuang Guangwen, it is plainly evident that caozheng cases happen on many occasions because the long-standing malpractices spread uncontrollably in the middle and late stages of the Qing. It is both the attitude taken by the local officials towards the management of caozheng and their rationale behind the exercise of power that always dictated how such incidents take place and come to an end and therein lies the crux of a persistent problem. The caozheng cases reflects the pervasive influence that the collection of grain taxes extends on the life of the gentries and commoners, and the far-reaching effect that the taxation exerts on the change of the social order in the localities. In essence the cases reveal, to a greater or lesser degree, the circumstances under which the national affairs of Qing are administered in society in the localities, and the tendencies that are displayed in the social order in the localities.     

清代誠齋詩學與唐宋詩之爭

南宋詩人楊萬里的詩歌創作甚豐而風格別樹一幟,他受到同代人賞識,卻不見重於元明兩代,到清代更是屢受惡評。在當時詩學的唐宋詩之爭中,誠齋詩往往不容於雙方。直至清末,纔受到同光詩人的推尊。本文通過梳理清代誠齋詩在唐宋詩之爭中的各期發展,最後聚焦到同光詩人的誠齋詩觀,指出夏敬觀是清代第一個全面肯定誠齋詩的學者,楊萬里的詩史地位最終因同光派而得以確立。     

中华人民共和国史研究新进展

中华人民共和国成立60周年前后,学术界掀起了国史研究的热潮,出版了大量的研究成果。其中系统记述中华人民共和国史的著作有陈述的《中华人民共和国史》[1]、陈明显主编的《中华人民共和国史教程》[2]、     

墓志铭起源初探

墓志作为先民追悼自己祖先的一种特殊的纪念物,沿袭下来已有近二千年的历史,本文关于墓志铭起源的探讨在考古和历史学研究中无疑将有重要意义。     

曹操墓出土“常所用”兵器考

曹操墓出土牌铭"魏武王常所用"兵器,分别为戟、矛、刀、椎四种,由导从及长短兵器,形成一套最简单的组合,执行"警跸侍卫如常仪"的基本功能,属于天子仪卫。例如"交戟",只有皇帝才能使用。曹操生前获得享用天子仪卫的资格。这套仪具既体现了曹操的薄葬主张,同时也是墓主身份地位和墓葬等级的重要标志。     

民国时期家谱中所见私立教育资料

族学是中国近现代一种非常重要的民间教育形式,而家谱和族谱作为家族活动内容的集中反映,对族学教育的原则、制度、规模、过程及结果,都有比较全面的记载.     

秦汉时的行钱

行钱一辞见于《汉书·百官公卿表》,武帝元鼎三年,“郸侯周仲居为太常,坐不收赤仄钱收行钱论。” 周仲居获罪之由是因为“不收赤仄钱”、“收行钱”。行钱是什么?先看颜师古对这段话作出的解释:     

抗战时期天津租界中国存银问题——以中英交涉为中心

1938年春夏之交,为避免留存于天津租界的巨额白银被日本窃夺,中国方面展开以英国为主的对外交涉。因国民政府最高决策者蒋介石对天津租界存银问题关注不够,直接从事对英交涉的外交部与主管货币银行事务的财政部未能充分沟通和融洽合作,加上英国一味维护自身利益,不顾中方反对,对日采取妥协退让政策,进而影响法国也向日本作出同样让步,中国存银最终被日本监控并攫夺。在对英交涉中,国民政府对英国不尊重中国的主权和重大利益的本质有了深刻认识,因此英国在国民政府战时外交全局中的地位下降。     

《晋书·北狄传》入塞屠各新论

屠各不是南匈奴后裔,但并州屠各的确融合到南匈奴之中。两者的区别在于南匈奴最初由塞外进入“去五原西部塞八十里”,后又“徙居西河美稷”,最终辗转迁入并州;而屠各一直居住在西河属国,当南匈奴徙居西河美稷后,屠各曾与南匈奴长期为邻,并与南匈奴一道迁移到并州。西河属国的屠各是汉武帝时安置在西河属国的。《晋书·北狄传》将屠各看作南匈奴后裔并认为屠各与南匈奴一道入居塞内,的确失之偏颇,但却道出了部分屠各与南匈奴一同进入并州的事实。