首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   149篇
  免费   3篇
  2023年   1篇
  2022年   1篇
  2020年   2篇
  2019年   8篇
  2018年   4篇
  2017年   8篇
  2016年   2篇
  2015年   4篇
  2014年   5篇
  2013年   33篇
  2012年   3篇
  2011年   4篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   7篇
  2008年   12篇
  2007年   14篇
  2006年   3篇
  2005年   4篇
  2004年   1篇
  2003年   2篇
  2000年   3篇
  1999年   2篇
  1998年   2篇
  1997年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1995年   2篇
  1994年   3篇
  1993年   1篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   1篇
  1986年   4篇
  1983年   1篇
  1981年   3篇
  1978年   2篇
  1977年   1篇
  1972年   1篇
  1970年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
  1947年   1篇
排序方式: 共有152条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
The connection between the history of reading and gender is made using a range of methodological perspectives, each illustrated by analysing concrete examples from the early modern Italian area. The significance of the circulation and reception of texts as well as the various attempts to control knowledge and behaviour via censorship and availability of reading material will be considered. In fact, since the XVI th century, written texts seem to play an increasingly influential role in defining the relationship between men and women. The figure of the early modern woman reader appears in literature sources as both a consciously constructed and easily influenced addressee, who nevertheless may still behave in a way different to that intended by the authors. This double approach facilitates the reading of normative texts from a new perspective that takes into account the possibility of creative adaptation and enables the question of interdependence between the production and reception of the written word to be reconsidered.  相似文献   
79.
80.
ABSTRACT

One of Michele Sarfatti’s greatest accomplishments has been to challenge the notion that there was a fundamental difference between the biological racism predominant in Nazi Germany and the ‘cultural racism’ of Fascist Italy. I examine how this dichotomy took shape and the meaning it acquired over time. My basic argument is that this division is the result of dialogue between Italian and German population experts during the interwar period, and that making a sharp distinction between a ‘German’ and an ‘Italian’ style of racism helped them to construct their own identities. In other words, the debate on racism was a vehicle for defining what it meant to be a ‘true’ Nazi or Fascist. In this way, differences in racist ideology can be understood as a product of struggles over meaning. Ultimately, my aim is to de-essentialize the meaning of race in research on both Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号