对杨奎松教授关于《毛泽东传》书评的回应北大核心CSSCI

在杨奎松教授对我的《毛泽东传》的评论中有明显的缺点。可以将杨教授声称在我的书中文版书中发现的"错误"大致归为三类。首先,我的中文版本译者的翻译错误。我没有充分的时间检查全部中文翻译的质量。这是出版社的责任。第二,所谓的"错误"造成的事实,其实是杨教授误解了我的话,并把我没有说过的话归在我的身上。第三,所谓的"错误"造成的事实,归根结底是因为杨教授不了解我使用的资料的来源。     

美国进步主义视角下的1917年俄国革命北大核心CSSCI

在第一次世界大战前夕和战争期间,进步主义思想早已在美国得到发展,主要以拥护威尔逊总统内政方针的资产阶级改良主义者、右翼社会党人以及持更具批评性意见的左翼自由主义者为代表。在1917年俄国革命爆发后,进步主义各方代表们各持己见,表现出不同反应,这不仅在美国引发了对俄国革命的排斥,同时也激起了他们对俄国激进主义的必然性、有效性进行合理化理解的尝试,从而导致威尔逊政府在对俄政策的制定上发生了混乱局面,也对美国社会如何看待俄国革命的问题上产生了深远影响。     

朔州县域生态环境建设中的金融支持研究

生态环境是人类生存和发展的摇篮,是经济发展、社会进步的基础。在县域范围内大力发展生态环境建设事业对加快社会主义新农村建设、提高县域经济发展水平、进一步解决“三农问题”有重要的意义。本文基于对朔州县域生态环境建设中金融支持的现状分析,指出存在的问题,并提出推动朔州县域生态环境建设步伐的对策和建议。     

“PUSH”,推动“共享遗产”理念的传播

<正>在多种族、政治色彩浓郁的地中海东部及沿岸诸国,《奈良真实性文件》和《巴拉宪章》成为当今制定遗产保护战略和促进各方交流的纲领性指导文件。大部分社会和政治背景复杂的历史遗址都涵盖了多元建筑价值观,大多数甚至所有相关方已基本认知并竭力保存这些价值观。上述建筑特性为遗址保护工作细节提出了挑战。与之相比,对"共享遗产"这一理念的阐释更具挑战性。"共享"旨在寻找一个公共平台,通过运用现代科技创造共有空间、强调共有特性以缓和不稳定的形势。"提升对‘共享遗产’的认知(Promoting the Understanding     

Schneider,Helen M., Keeping the Nation＇s House.＂ Domestic Management and the Making of Modern China

According to the ancient wisdom of the Great Learning （Daxue）, the regulation of a state extends from proper regulation of family affairs. This doctrine echoes throughout Helen Schneider＇s fascinating study of how the imported discipline of home economics （jiazheng xue） became domesticated in China before 1949. Like other new disciplines in China,     

Between Galen, Geddes, and the Gael: Arthur Brock, modernity, and medical humanism in early-twentieth-century Scotland

Arthur Brock (1879-1947) is generally remembered as the physician who treated poet Wilfred Owen for shell shock and as the translator of Galen and other ancient physicians. He was also a key figure in the early-twentieth-century humanist revival within medicine. Brock's interest in humanism, I argue, was inspired by a broader concern about modernity and by a desire to return medicine and society to the more harmonious, organic existence that he believed was characteristic of ancient Greece and could still be found among "primitive" peoples, such as the Scottish Gaels. This article explores Brock's anxieties about modernity and its relations to his interests in ancient and "primitive" peoples; to his medical thought and practice; to his interests in history, sociology, language, and translation; and to his involvement in the social and political life of Edinburgh and North Queensferry, where he moved in 1925. Crucially, it shows how all these interests and activities were influenced by Brock's mentor, Edinburgh polymath Patrick Geddes. The article concludes with a discussion of Brock's place in early-twentieth-century medical humanism.     

Veterinary immunology as colonial science: method and quantification in the investigation of horsesickness in South Africa, C. 1905-1945

This article examines the practice of veterinary immunology in South Africa during the first half of the twentieth century through an analysis of research into a horsesickness vaccine at the Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute. From the early 1900s, Arnold Theiler prioritized research into horsesickness, by then defined as an insect-borne disease caused by an ultravisible virus. He succeeded in devising a means of prophylaxis using a simultaneous injection of infective blood and immune serum, but he discovered antigenically different strains of the virus, which could overcome the immunity produced by his treatment. The practical value of Theiler's methods was further limited by difficulties in standardizing the biological material used in immunization, the results of which remained too erratic for application on a large scale. No further advances were made until the 1930s, by which time Onderstepoort had been drawn more closely into international scientific networks. Using techniques derived from research into yellow fever in America and canine distemper in Britain, the Onderstepoort scientist Raymond Alexander invented a method of immunization that utilized the propagation of the horsesickness virus in the brains of mice. Alexander's methods, which were characterized by successful technical adaptation and innovation, depended upon methods of quantification first developed by Paul Ehrlich to standardize diphtheria antitoxin during the 1890s. During the 1940s, vaccination expanded rapidly in South Africa, and Onderstepoort later exported the vaccine and associated technology to other countries affected by horsesickness.