共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
Urban Wiesing 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1997,20(4):295-296
3.
Eva-Maria Henig 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1999,22(1):51-52
4.
Eva‐Maria Stolberg 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2006,29(2):109-120
?Exotic Bodies”?: Russian Anthropology and Medicine in the Colonial Discours of Late Imperial Russia. In the nineteenth century Russian anthropologists adopted Western theories on the biological superiority of the white man in order to justify Russian colonization at the Asiatic periphery. After the Great Reforms the imperial process of acculturation was discussed in the context of modernization that also touched the institutionalization of colonial medicine. Whereas Russian armchair anthropologists were operating with racial idioms, physicians as practitioners on the colonial spot were not receptive to the ideology of “white man's burden”. From experience with the socioeconomic backwardness of Russia's Asiatic periphery physicians stood up for the vital rights of the indigenous population in the colonial Public Health. With deep respect for indigenous medicine Russian physicians were not advocates of Russian colonial expansion and racial discrimination that made them different to their Western colleagues. On the basis of Russian nineteenth century medical literature and Siberian archival sources this paper outlines the critical reflections of Russian physicians on Tsarist colonialism 相似文献
5.
Lothar Suhling 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1999,22(4):287-288
6.
7.
8.
9.
Alfons Labisch/Florian Tennstedt 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1987,10(3):191-192
10.
11.
12.
13.
nne Bumer-Schleinkofer 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1992,15(4):259-260
14.
Alfons Labisch 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1995,18(1):37-40
15.
nne Bumer-Schleinkofer 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1991,14(1):55-57
16.
《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2000,23(1):76-78
17.
18.
Nicolaas Rupke 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2000,23(1):35-36
19.
Eberhard Wolff 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1999,22(1):52-53