共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》1994,115(1-2):307-307
2.
《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》1993,114(2):370-370
3.
《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》1995,116(1):199-199
4.
《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》1994,115(3-4):527-527
5.
《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》1993,114(1):184-184
6.
Dominique Lecourt 《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》2005,126(2):451-454
Sans résumé
novembre 2000
Dominique Lecourt est président du Comité d'éthique de l'Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD) et professeur de
philosophie à l'université de Paris 7 où il dirige le centre Georges-Canguilhem (case courrier 7041, 2 place Jussieu, F-75251
Paris Cedex 05). 相似文献
7.
Jean-Marc Rohrbasser 《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》2007,128(3-4):341-355
Wolff’s review of Leibniz’metaphysics is discussed in the correspondence between Voltaire and Frederick, the future Frederick II. Frederick attempts to introduce and to convert Voltaire to Wolffianism. Even though he declares it remarkable, Voltaire has little esteem for the Wolffian method. Rejecting Baylian fideism, Frederick is unwilling to renounce voluntarily the knowledge that can be acquired through reasoning. According to Voltaire, metaphysical truths remain inaccessible. The only defensible position is hence that of metaphysical scepticism. Frederick acknowledges this: having studied the sciences and observed the spirit of men, the inclination towards scepticism is natural. Hence, the debate on monads has led Frederick to renounce his previous Wolffianism. He is ready to become the perfect despot, pragmatic and realistic, a follower of the French Enlightenment. 相似文献
8.
Willem A. Groetaers 《东方研究杂志》2013,61(1):207-231
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Frédéric Royall 《Modern & Contemporary France》2019,27(2):273-274
15.
S. Eitrem 《Symbolae Osloenses / auspiciis Societatis Graeco-Latinae》2013,87(1):133-151
In reply to a recent contribution by C. Coppola (AFLN 21 [N.S. 9], 1978–79, 73–82), the authors discuss the reading and restoration of Cod. Marc. gr. 450, fol. lr, col. II, lines 1–10, with apo‐graphs. Corrections and modifications to Coppola's text and critical apparatus are offered and a new restoration and translation of col. I, line 29, through col. II, line 13 (=Bibl. p. 1.8–14 Bekker), attempted. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Isabelle Kalinowski 《Revue de synthèse / Centre international de synthèse》2008,129(2):261-284
The long note which Max Weber devotes to traditional Indian dancers in his study on the sociology of religions in India, Hinduism and Buddhism, is commented upon here through a comparison with one of the first German studies which deals with dance in India, The World history of the dance by Curt Sachs. Three themes are discussed: the relationship between the arts of the body and scholarly knowledge; the specificity of sacred arts, in this case the magical arts and the forms which correspond to them, such as the modes of apprenticeship which assure their transmission (understood as a «hereditary charisma»); the vision of women and the notion of the pure and the impure. 相似文献
19.