共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Bruno Leclercq,Fondements logiques et phénoménologiques de la rationalité mathématique chez Husserl. Contributions husserliennes au débat sur la „crise des fondements“, (Mathesis) Paris: Vrin 2015. 198 S., € 20,00. ISBN 978‐2‐7116‐2595‐6.
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Stany Mazurkiewicz 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2016,39(3):287-288
5.
6.
Elizabeth Harding (Hrsg.), Kalkulierte Gelehrsamkeit. Zur Ökonomisierung der Universitäten im 18. Jahrhundert, (Wolfenbütteler Forschungen 148) Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag 2016. 300 S., 11 Abb., € 62,00. ISBN 978‐3‐447‐10714‐3..
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Justus Nipperdey 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2017,40(4):393-394
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
KRISZTINA ROBERT 《History and theory》2013,52(3):319-343
In First‐World‐War Britain, women's ambition to perform noncombatant duties for the military faced considerable public opposition. Nevertheless, by late 1916 up to 10,000 members of the female volunteer corps were working for the army, laying the foundation for some 90,000 auxiliaries of the official Women's Services, who filled support positions in the armed forces in the second half of the war. This essay focuses on the public debate in which the volunteers overcame their critics to understand how they obtained sufficient popular consent for their martial work. I explain the process in terms of shifting hegemonic understandings of space. As critics' arguments in the debate indicate, the gender attribution of war participation was organized and represented spatially, assigning men to the warlike “front” as warriors and women to the peaceful “home” as civilians. To redefine the meaning of these gendered wartime spaces, women volunteers deployed rival spatial discourses and practices in their campaign for martial employment. The essay explores the progress of these competing definitions through feminist and spatial theories, including gender performativity, discursively constructed and constructive spaces, and heterotopias. I argue that the upheaval caused by the war in gender and spatial norms undermined absolute conceptualizations of space with dichotomous binary areas on which critics drew for their arguments and reinforced more recent, relative spatialities, including the cultural construction of militarized heterotopic sites in between and paralleling both “home” and “front” for soldiers in training or recovery. The volunteers' efforts to gain access to military employment both contributed to and were supported by this shift. Heterotopic sites offered ideal discursive locations for constructing the new gender role of auxiliary soldiering through the performance of martial training and work, and competing spatial definitions provided arguments through which they could justify their activities to both critics and supporters. 相似文献
12.
13.
Michael Eggers,Vergleichendes Erkennen. Zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Epistemologie des Vergleichs und zur Genealogie der Komparatistik, (Germanisch‐Romanische Monatsschrift,Beiheft 68) Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter 2017. 448 S., € 66,00. ISBN 978‐3‐8253‐6459‐5..
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Ernst Müller 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2017,40(4):396-397
14.
Ina Heumann,Gegenstücke. Populäres Wissen im transatlantischen Vergleich (1948–1984), (Wissenschaft,Macht und Kultur in der modernen Geschichte 4) Wien usw.: Böhlau 2014. 391 S., 29 s/w und 35 farb. Abb., € 49,00. ISBN 978‐3‐205‐79511‐7.
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Safia Azzouni 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2016,39(1):115-116
15.
16.
17.
18.
MARNIE HUGHES‐WARRINGTON 《History and theory》2007,46(4):61-76
Revision in history is conventionally characterized as a linear sequence of changes over time. Drawing together the contributions of those engaged in historiographical debates that are often associated with the term “revision,” however, we find our attention directed to the spaces rather than the sequences of history. Contributions to historical debates are characterized by the marked use of spatial imagery and spatialized language. These used to suggest both the demarcation of the “space of history” and the erasure of existing historiographies from that space. Bearing these features in mind, the essay argues that traditional, temporally oriented explanations for revision in history, such as Thomas S. Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions, miss the mark, and that a more promising line of explanation arises from the combined use of Michel Foucault's idea of “heterotopias” and Marc Augé's idea of “non‐places.” Revision in history is to be found where writers use imagery to move readers away from rival historiographies and to control their movement in the space of history toward their desired vision. Revision is thus associated more with control than with liberation. 相似文献
19.