我们用唱歌学说话，用跳舞学走路

据说,在石乃亥,孩子们“唱歌学说话,跳舞学走路”。呀呀学语的孩子咿咿吟哦着的第一句谁也听不懂的话,像“勒”,又有点像段夏,像花儿,又有点像勾毛：至于歪歪扭扭迈出的第一步,可以约略看得出,那似乎是锅庄、堆谐、则柔、卓则或热巴……     

耕夫诗词钞

·2008·冬季号中国土族枸杞为报三春暖,精诚结渥丹。莫嫌身带刺,不许野禽餐。瀑布源出千重岭,流飞百丈崖。崎岖浑不顾,逐浪到天涯。丁亥七夕,日前闻凤凰桥垮塌云堆银汉畔,牛女共心焦。但恐烟岚重,摧坍喜鹊桥。登湟源南古城扼襟雄镇地,故垒势峥嵘。风咽闻羌笛,云舒展汉旌。峡衔     

War by Conference

KEITH SAINSBURY. The Turning Point: Roosevelt, Stalin, and Chiang Kai-Shek, 1943: The Moscow, Cairo, and Teheran Conferences. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1985. Pp. 373. £17.50, $29.95 (US); KEITH EUBANK. Summit at Teheran. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1985. Pp. 528. $21.95 (US).     

编辑人语

<民俗研究>创刊于1985年,至2008年底共出齐88期,屈指算来,岁月荏苒已是二十三载.二十三年,<民俗研究>从落草到青壮,从蕴蓄走向升华;二十三年,我们与作者如琢如磨,相携成长,勇担中国民俗学学术发展之任.本刊自诞生直至今日,前任主编叶涛教授一直参与其中,含辛茹苦,胼手胝足,值其功成身藏之际,编辑部全体同仁向他表示由衷敬意.     

Learning by Debating

This essay traces the main lines of debate among economists during the course of China's reform. It first reviews how the market has become legitimated in the country. Then it examines three schools of thought that have emerged from an ongoing debate over the economic role of the state in China's “socialist market economy.” Debates have transformed radically the conceptual frameworks of economists, as well as policymakers, and thereby have exerted enormous influence on the policy process.     

Learning by Failing

The Norwegian Government Pension Fund, or more commonly the Norwegian Petroleum Fund, established in 1990, is the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund. The fund is commonly regarded as a successful product of economic foresight in a country with strong traditions of long-term planning. As the fund was established in a period during which leading social scientists strongly doubted the ability of Norwegian political and administrative institutions to handle the large oil riches, the article examines the background of the fund in detail. Government archives reveal that senior advisors in the central administration opposed and delayed the establishment of a petroleum fund. The argument in the article is that the advisors’ previous experience with fund structures, combined with the institutional logic in which the most important advisors were situated, explains both the long-lasting opposition against the fund and how and why the fund acquired its main characteristics.