共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
ALASDAIR HAWKYARD 《Parliamentary History》2010,29(1):22-48
During the Tudor period the Speaker was nominated by the crown. The house of commons acquiesced with the crown's nomination, but not entirely passively. There is a body of evidence suggesting that the crown's nominee became the focus of disapprobation once his name became known. What hostility there was to the Speaker-designate from the mid 16th century was displayed to better effect outside the House than within. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
Alasdair Hawkyard 《Parliamentary History》2014,33(3):389-421
The journals for both the house of lords and the house of commons for the Tudor period are not, in our sense of the word, journals. Political historians coming to them with unwarranted expectations based on the modern concept of journal have been disappointed by what they have found. The men who compiled both sets of records never saw them as more than notes on the business of both Houses which they kept for their own use. 相似文献
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.