共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
John B. Gabel 《History of European Ideas》2013,39(3):365-366
In this article I revisit the ideas of Antonio Gramsci and Nikolai Bukharin from a contextual perspective to argue for a revision in the way current scholarship on Gramsci interprets his thought as fundamentally at odds with that of Bukharin. I show in particular that if we resist the temptation to reduce Bukharin to the level of his 1921 book, Historical Materialism, and concentrate instead on his more sophisticated NEP writings of the mid-1920s a series of symmetries in the advanced thought of these two key thinkers of early 20th century Marxism emerges that have been poorly recognised in the literature on Gramsci to date. 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
Laika Nevalainen 《European Review of History》2017,24(6):1007-1008
12.
13.
《国际历史评论》2012,34(1):214-231
AbstractAmity, an affective as well as pragmatic political relationship, was the primary mechanism of mid-Tudor foreign policy. It was often the first step toward a formal alliance, but it did not constitute a binding agreement in itself. In fact, political friendship’s inherent legal ambiguity allowed the Tudors to work around the strictures of existing international treaties when diplomatic circumstances changed and it became necessary to reevaluate relationships abroad. Amity’s flexibility could also limit its effectiveness as a collaborative partnership. This was especially the case if two parties challenged a consensus in the international community. In negotiating amity diplomats appealed to moral, affective, and contractual obligations simultaneously. They did not acknowledge any categorical difference between emotive personal friendship and utilitarian public amity. Rather, they asserted that loving friends at once promoted each other’s strategic advantage and growth in virtue. Friendship was ultimately grounded in mutual trust, which was established by personal encounters and reinforced through law and ritual. This essay considers the application of amity in Anglo-Imperial, Anglo-Schmalkalden, and Anglo-Scottish contexts in 1542–1560 as a basis for comparative analysis. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
《中国西藏(英文版)》1995,(3)
TheDevelopmentofTibetanCulture¥//ZHANGZHIWEIHistoryprovesthatadevelopedcultureisaprerequisiteforsocioeconomicdevelopment.Cult... 相似文献
18.
19.
Jan Lindegren 《Scandinavian journal of history》2013,38(4):305-336
Erik Ringmar, Identity, Interest and Action. A Cultural Explanation of Sweden's Intervention in the Thirty Tears’ War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996). 236 pp. ISBN 0–521–56314–3. 相似文献
20.