来集之《倘湖樵书》与《博学汇书》版刻考

通过清康熙刻板《倘湖樵书》多个印本与《博学汇书》版刻的比较,指出《博学汇书》与《倘湖樵书》实为同书异名,前者是在后者书板基础上改刻而成。包括《博学汇书》在内,康熙刻本《倘湖樵书》经历了初印本、第二次改编印本、改题《博学汇书》印本、回改题名后印本等至少四个阶段,各次印本的内容、编次、文字等都有较大差异。     

《书小史》辨误

<正>陈思,字伏宓,临安(今浙江杭州)人,约生活在南宋宁宗至度宗时期,终生以鬻书为业,著述编撰有《书小史》、《小字录》、《海棠谱》、《书苑菁华》、《两宋名贤小集》、《宝刻丛编》等。《书小史》是史传类书学论著的开山之作,全书仿照纪传体史书体     

华峤《后汉书》考述

在诸家东汉史中 ,西晋人华峤所著《后汉书》① 甚得刘勰、刘知几的推重 ,是史学价值较高的一部。其史学价值主要表现在 ,第一 ,首创《皇后纪》这一史书体例 ,被范晔《后汉书》所采用 ;于《孝子传》前撰序论的作法 ,则为范晔、沈约及后世史家沿用。第二 ,由于文质事核 ,该书成为范晔著《后汉书》的主要蓝本之一。第三 ,书中的某些记载 ,可弥补范晔《后汉书》删节诸家后汉书过简的不足。另外 ,华峤重谱系、重天人感应等颇具时代特色的史学思想 ,亦有可取之处 ,对后世产生了一定的影响。     

北大汉简中的《雨书》

这部《雨书》是北大汉简数术书中的一种,有书名(简2505背),内容又分《雨》、《星(晴)》、《候风雨》、《候》、《霁》、《雷》等篇。全书现存48枚     

《越绝书》与公羊学

<正>《越绝书》是一部记载古代吴、越史地为主的地方史志。关于该书的作者说法一直较多,难以定论。然考其文字,却可以发现许多与公羊学有关的内容。前人也多指出"作者盖传《公羊》家学",或说"作者笃信《公羊》","宗《公羊》家言"(乐祖谋点校:《越绝书·越绝书序跋辑录》,上海:上海古籍出版社1985年版,第118、122、121页)。通过对《越绝书》文字的梳理,《越绝书》中与公羊学有关的内容主要集中于《外传本事》《吴内传》《德序外传记》《篇叙外传记》等篇中。本文试对     

黄宗羲《授书随笔》考实

《中国古籍总目》著录国家图书馆藏题为"黄宗羲辑"的《授书随笔》,实为方中履的《古今释疑》。钱穆《中国近三百年学术史》力辟黄宗羲授阎若璩《尚书》并撰成《授书随笔》之说,认为全祖望《梨洲先生神道碑文》所说的《授书随笔》当为误传,黄宗羲根本未撰写过此书。万经《辨志堂新辑书经集解》引用《授书随笔》十则,为黄宗羲确曾撰有此书之铁证。梁启超称《授书随笔》为辨伪《古文尚书》之作,乃阎若璩《尚书古文疏证》之先导。然万经所引十则,分别是对《舜典》《大禹谟》《皋陶谟》《胤征》《仲虺之诰》诸篇义理之阐发,其中《大禹谟》《胤征》《仲虺之诰》皆在伪古文二十五篇之内,并有为伪古文辩护之语,则此书非辨伪《古文尚书》之作。     

《史记·律书·历书》考释

《史记·律书·历书》考释刘操南中国正史在二十四史中,撰天文志、律历志的有十七史。《史记》首创八书,将《律书》、《历书》、《天官书》分为三书。《汉书》将《律》、《历》两书合为《律历志》。此后各志,有分有合。司马迁对于《律书》、《历书》两者关系有其观点。...     

《后汉书》李贤注辨析

《后汉书》李贤注辨析顾义生《后汉书》本纪十卷,列传八一十卷,系南朝宋范晔撰,唐章怀太子李贤等注。李注侧重字句的诠释,对于后人阅读《后汉书》和研究词义颇有裨益。但是,正如中华书局编辑部《后汉书出版说明》所指出的：＂由于参加作注的人较多,又没有仔细校订,...     

新发现的线装本《张天师发病书》《发病全书》整理研究

新近搜集的《张天师发病书》《发病全书》是除敦煌吐鲁番文献外,为数不多保存至今的《发病书》资料。它们的发现促进了学界对中国古代《发病书》更为全面的了解,并与敦煌吐鲁番出土《发病书》写卷共同弥补了唐宋至明清以降《发病书》史料链条的缺失环节,有力证实了《发病书》确曾作为一类专门书籍在传统中国长期存在。敦煌吐鲁番出土《发病书》写卷并非西北某一地区所特有,而是该类文献在历史时期普遍流行背景下的区域缩影。为便于学界利用新发现的《发病书》资料,将经过整理的相关释文予以公布。     

《后汉书》校勘辨正

《后汉书》校勘辨正何亚男中华书局标点本《后汉书》（下称标点本）,自从１９６５年出版以来,向以校点审慎详密而备受学人称誉。在《后汉书》的流传史中,标点本是一个里程碑,它不仅给全书（包括李贤注）加上了新式标点,方便了读者,而且汇集了前人的校勘成果,详细地...     

新文化地理学视角下景观研究综述与展望

景观意义一方面要对其符号化的表征元素进行解读,另一方面也要关注其不可表征的意义。本研究梳理了国外新文化地理学视角下的景观研究,发现： ①表征视角下,一方面景观既被看作文化的产物,又是不同时期文化的再生;另一方面景观在权力博弈中曲折发展并推动其象征性意义的演变。②非表征视角主要关注日常生活行为、情感等方面所反应的社会变迁以及所感知的多元、复杂与不稳定的景观意义。国内新文化地理学视角的景观研究在西方思潮的影响下,对一些具体案例进行了尝试性研究,取得了一定的成果。本研究有助于中国学者结合转型期中国政治、经济、文化背景,构建具有中国特色的新文化地理学景观理论体系,推动新文化地理学在中国的良性发展。     

江苏文化线路遗产及其保护

文化线路遗产集世界文化遗产与自然遗产之大成,不仅具有空间、时间、文化及功能等特征,而且体现出历史与现实相续、人文与自然合一、时间与空间的多维度、遗产价值的多元化等特性。江苏境内文化线路遗产丰富,主要有大运河遗产内容、佛教传播线路、郑和七下西洋线路、康乾下江南线路等,目前已形成了构建法律体系、实施宏观保护,以动态发展的眼光审视与发挥文化线路的价值,建立多学科、多国别、多地区、多部门的通力合作,以科学审慎的态度对待文化线路中的每一个个案处理等保护思路。     

‘They'd Rather Go Play Footy’: an Exploratory Study of the Enjoyment and Benefits of the Arts in Western Australia's Remote Murchison Region

The role of the arts in the revitalisation and strengthening of Australia's rural, remote, and Indigenous communities has been of particular interest to Australian State and Federal Governments, as reflected through various policy and positioning documents. In order to understand the relationship between the arts and communities, it is important to explore why people engage in the arts and what might be some of the barriers to that engagement. For the rural, remote and Indigenous communities of the Murchison Region, the arts has been a useful way of reaching and engaging with residents to build a stronger sense of community, provide light relief and entertainment, and facilitate communication among community members, government, and industry. However, there are several barriers that impact on the viability of arts projects. These barriers are amplified in rural and remote areas, and particularly for the three case study communities of the Murchison Region for a number of reasons. These include the transient nature of the population, a lack of resources, isolation and remoteness, and local politics, culture and history. The arts can provide a context in which other non‐arts related outcomes, such as health, capacity building, income generation, and so on, are facilitated and achieved. It is important for policy makers to recognise and address the barriers which hinder activity and serve to lessen the impact of the arts on communities.     

Unfinished Decolonisation and Globalisation

ABSTRACT

This article locates John Darwin’s work on decolonisation within an Oxbridge tradition which portrays a British world system, of which formal empire was but one part, emerging to increasing global dominance from the early nineteenth century. In this mental universe, decolonisation was the mirror image of that expanding global power. According to this point of view, it was not the sloughing off of individual territories, but rather the shrinking away of the system and of the international norms that supported it, until only its ghost remained by the end of the 1960s. The article then asks, echoing the title of Darwin’s Unfinished Empire, whether the decolonisation project is all but complete, or still ongoing. In addition, what is the responsibility of the imperial historian to engage with, inform, or indeed refrain from, contemporary debates that relate to some of these issues? The answer is twofold. On the one hand, the toolkit that the Oxbridge tradition and Darwin provide remains relevant, and also useful in thinking about contemporary issues such as China’s move towards being a global power, the United States’ declining hegemony, and some states and groups desires to rearticulate their relationship with the global. On the other hand, the decline of world systems of power needs to be recognised as just one of several types of, and approaches to, analysing ‘decolonisation’. One which cannot be allowed to ignore or marginalise the study of others, such as experience, first nations issues, the shaping of the postcolonial state, and empire legacies. The article concludes by placing the Oxbridge tradition into a broader typology of types and methodologies of decolonisation, and by asking what a new historiography of decolonisation might look like. It suggests that it would address the Oxbridge concern with the lifecycles of systems of power and their relationship to global changes, but also place them alongside, and in dialogue with, a much broader set of perspectives and analytical approaches.     

Archaeological Interpretation of the Continuity of Chinese Civilization over Five Thousand Years

Chinese civilization has unique characteristics in the world civilization history. Its most prominent characteristic is the continuity of the “5,000-year” civilization. Over 5,000 years ago, different civilizations appeared in different regions of China and the civilizations mainly included their different early-stage theocracy and reign modes. Among these civilizations, the civilization that was handed on from generation to generation was the states with a reign mode that originated in the Longshan culture of Central China and its successors such as the Xia Dynasty, the Shang Dynasty, the Zhou Dynasty, the Qin Dynasty, the Han Dynasty, the Yuan Dynasty, the Ming Dynasty, and the Qing Dynasty. This can be illustrated by the 5,000-year continuous inheritance of the country, people, and territory of China, proved by the 5,000-year inheritance and development of capitals, royal tombs, ritual and ceremonial buildings and vessels, and characters as the national culture (or major tradition) and resurrected by the capital’s centralization,“OneGate Three-Passage” pattern,“centralization of the main hall of the court” and the“Left Ancestral Temple and Right Altar” pattern, and the central axis of the capital, the four doors on four sides of the capital and court, etc. as the materialized forms of the core ideas of center and moderation. These materialized forms of the unbroken civilization became more and more in the past 5,000 years, which indicates that the ideas of center and moderation became stronger and stronger and were constantly deepened. The ideological roots of the 5,000-year unbroken Chinese civilization are the ideas of center and moderation, which are the ideological basis for the state identity and the core value of the Chinese national history.     

地理学视角下的集体记忆研究综述

集体记忆植根于人、空间(地方、景观)、时间,是地理学研究人地关系的重要视角与手段。本文从理论渊源、研究内容、方法等对国内外相关文献进行梳理,提出地理学视角下的集体记忆研究框架。研究立足于集体记忆主体、载体和机制三方面,以空间、地方、景观、仪式、旅游等为主要研究对象,关注现象背后的政治性、竞争-协商性以及利益主体,个案研究为主,案例类型较为丰富,方法上定性为主,鲜有定量研究及相关模型构建。相比国外研究热潮与成果,国内研究仍处于萌芽起步与概念引入阶段,未来可拓展集体记忆载体形式的研究,深化集体记忆机制即人地关系层面,加强实证与量化方法应用。     

基于新人本主义理念的城市社区生活空间公正结构探讨

本文以城市各阶层日常生活行为的工作(上学)、家务、购物、闲暇活动完成的区位空间结构为议题,运用行为地理学的人本主义研究方法,以社区为基本研究尺度,探讨微观领域社会空间公正体系的结构与模式。得出城市社会空间体系发育阶段,影响城市社区生活空间结构的基本因子为城市资源、社区资源、社区类型-体系与场所体系,社区资源与城市资源在城市内部空间的布局呈"点-轴"结合模式,城市资源的线性空间体系格局与社区资源与场所的点状空间镶嵌映射了市场经济规律下城市社区生活空间结构的"集聚-碎化"倾向,缺失空间公正。最后,尝试性提出了人本、公平理念下的城市社区生活空间公正结构。     

Key issues in the conceptualization of tourism destinations

The purpose of this paper is to review the evolution of how the term ‘destination’ has been used, critiqued, and analyzed. While the traditional view of a destination has largely focused geographical features and the systemic concept of tourism destinations has focused on the interaction between tourists, the staff in industries providing tourism services, and the local population, more recent conceptualizations of tourism destinations treat destinations as complex adaptive systems that adapt to ever-changing economic, political, and social trends. As well, recent work on integrative conceptual frameworks of tourism destinations highlights the importance of particular geographical elements in the emergence and development of destinations which affect the structure of the mode of production, the range of stakeholders involved in tourism activity, and the entire process of destinations evolution. Although the traditional – geographic concept of destination, from today's point of view, is one-sided and not comprehensive, geographical elements, however, are the nucleus from which a tourism destination occurs and develops. In this regard, it is indisputable that the geographical attributes of tourism destinations represent the key component of their resource base. This fact should be borne in mind in future conceptualizations of destinations.     

明清时期长江武汉段江面的沙洲演变

本文论述了明清时期今长江武汉段江面上近武昌江岸和近汉阳江岸的沙洲演变,认为江中的沙洲变迁在东、西两岸大致经历了鹦鹉洲(偏东岸)、刘公洲(偏西岸)、金沙洲(偏东岸)、新刘公洲(偏西岸)、白沙洲(偏东岸)、新鹦鹉洲(偏西岸)、新白沙洲(偏东岸)这一交替出现及消亡或并岸的过程;并指出沙洲演变与港口变迁及商业市集贸易、南北两岸岸线及城垣堤防之间的关系,以及由此导致的东西两岸在经济利益和城垣堤防上的矛盾和冲突等一系列问题。     

Key variables for developing integrated rural tourism

Considering how important tourism development is as an element of economic recovery in rural areas, one of its objectives should be sustainability. The starting point must therefore be the existence of partnerships and cooperation between stakeholders. Such cooperation would enable the integration of tourism development through the endogeneity, complementarity, and embeddedness of the resources and the empowerment of the residents. The objective of this research is to determine the basic types of relationships to be developed in order to achieve integrated rural tourism. Initially, we verify the variables involved in integrated rural tourism by determining the measurement models, and subsequently we propose a model that reflects the relationships between the variables under study. Our research shows that there must be two types of collaboration between stakeholders. First, there must be collaboration to develop a tourism product, and second, there must be collaboration to provide adequate information about the existing tourism activities. Due the nature of tourism, various types of businesses must work together, but if information is not subsequently provided about the product, then tourism cannot develop as desired. Collaboration as a whole also favours the development of rural tourism in which tourism activities complement the traditional activities of an area, consequently increases the embeddedness of the product and the endogeneity of the resources. Furthermore, the opinions of the various stakeholders in tourism development must be taken into account, especially the residents, which takes place through empowerment. Finally, collaboration means that residents and tourists must coexist and come into contact, therefore sharing public services and entertainment and leisure locations. All the aforementioned factors consequently provide the basis for integrating the rural tourism that is developed in an area, which will favour the economic, sociocultural, and environmental sustainability of that area.