京都大学人文科学研究所共同研究班：以中国近代史为例

日本京都大学人文科学研究所(以下简称“人文研”)的共同研究,可以说取得了一些多少令学界关注的成果。当然,共同研究也只能构筑在个人研究的基础上,这一点毋庸赘言;不过,共同研究超越了个人研究单纯的总和这一点也确凿无疑。在此我想介绍一下自己也深深参与其中的“人文研”中     

胡绳与近代史研究所——胡绳同志逝世一周年的怀念

胡绳同志是我们党的理论家。他的理论兴趣广泛,述涉及哲学、中共党史、中国近代史以及时政评论。他不仅是一个学,还是一个政治活动家,为新民主主义革命的胜利、为社会主义建设的成功,贡献了心力。作为学,他的中国近代史研究,是他重要的学术贡献之一。据我所知,他与近代史研究所关系很深,对近代史研究所的发展十分关注。     

敬播史学成就探微

敬播以他的博学多识,参与了唐初许多重要史学活动,为唐前期史学发展做出不可磨灭的贡献。他身在史馆,能秉笔直书,所纂高祖、太宗《实录》,被誉为"信而详"、"颇多详直",从而赢得"陈寿之流"的美誉。他对史书的编纂体例有独到见解,纂修《晋书》有发凡起例之功。他参与纂修隋史,为唐初"鉴戒史学"的发展做出了贡献。由他编纂的《西域图志》,在边疆史地及中外交通史研究上有重要价值。刘知几对其史学成就给予了高度评价,称他具有"良史"之才。     

Networks, narratives and territory in anthropological race classification: towards a more comprehensive historical geography of Europe's culture

This article aims to integrate discourse analysis of politically instrumental imagined identity geographies with the relational and territorial geography of the communities of praxis and interpretation that produce them. My case study is the international community of nationalist scientists who classified Europe's biological races in the 1820s-1940s. I draw on network analysis, relational geography, historical sociology and the historical turn to problematize empirically how spatial patterns of this community's shifting disciplinary and political coalitions, communication networks and power relations emerged, were structured, persisted, changed, interacted and disappeared. I focus especially on core-periphery relations. I argue that if local historical spatial patterns affect those of later phenomena, geographies like that of European integration should be understood in the context of Europe's complex historical cultural geography. Unlike discourse deconstruction alone, this complementary relational de-essentialization of geography can identify large-scale, enduring associations of cultural patterns as well as cultural flux and ambiguity.     

Ancient Greece: Recent developments in Aegean archaeology and regional studies

This review begins by defining the diverse field of Greek archaeology. Based on our own expertise, we focus on recent advances in the study of ancient Greece, especially the prehistoric Aegean, and on regional approaches, primarily those associated with archaeological surface survey. General developments in method and theory are addressed as they relate to several major topics: social complexity, Aegean chronology, writing systems, exchange, and regional studies.     

Exploring Regional Domains: A Comparative History of Regionalism

This article offers an overview of the history and development of regionalism with a view to providing a framework for thinking about its progress and prospects in different parts of the world. After a preliminary discussion of the problems encountered in defining regions and regionalism, the article moves to a historical and comparative analysis, ranging widely to include examples from many different regions. It argues that regionalism should be understood as an evolutionary and cumulative process, which has grown and expanded to take in new tasks and new domains. It has become an increasingly important component of the different structures of global governance, and one whose potential neither states, multilateral institutions, nor non-state actors can afford to ignore.