共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Urban Wiesing 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1997,20(4):295-296
2.
Annelore Rieke‐Müller 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2003,26(2):113-128
Iconoclasm is one of the central characteristic of the reformation movement. In several books it was argued that there was a connection between iconoclasm and the interpretation of nature as a language and as a text since about 1600. This article discusses the artist as a creator in Renaissance culture. It shows the reaction of Luther to this concept and to iconoclasm, focussing on the connection between the Lutheran control of pictures and images and his conception of the mind and of memory on the one hand and of creatures as images and natural history on the other. In Lutheran context the book of nature was a book made of images as signs of the word of God. 相似文献
3.
Eva-Maria Henig 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1999,22(1):51-52
4.
5.
6.
7.
Paul Richard Blum 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1994,17(2):144-144
8.
9.
Miloš Vec 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2007,30(3):235-254
The mind on the stage of justice: The formation of criminal psychology in the 19th century and its interdisciplinary research. – Criminal psychology emerges at the end of the 18th century as a new academic discipline in lectures and publications. It has recently been investigated by a considerable number of contributions from researchers of different academic backgrounds. In many respects criminal psychology can be seen as a predecessor of criminology. Its subject is the analysis of the origins of crime and its causes and determinants in the human mind. Criminal psychology embraced at that time philosophical, medical, legal and biological aspects. The latter increase in importance in the second half of the 19th century. The conditions of individual responsibility were generally codified in penal law, but had to be individually investigated in crucial cases through expertise in court. There a conflict emerged between medical experts and judges about their ability and competence to decide. At the end of the 19th century criminal psychology is used to fulfil the needs and interests of a criminal law which understands itself as increasingly utilitarian. Force and new instruments of treatment of offenders were legitimized by scientists who were very optimistic about their own epistemological abilities. 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Ulrich Kruse 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1997,20(4):337-337
15.
16.
17.
nne Bumer-Schleinkofer 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1991,14(1):55-57
18.
19.
Lothar Suhling 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1999,22(4):287-288
20.
Christoph Meinel 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1985,8(1):25-45
In its attempt to achieve acknowledgement and support as a true science and academic discipline eighteenth-century chemistry experienced that the traditional distinction between theory and practice, respectively between science and art, was an incriminating heritage and did not longer conform to the way chemists saw themselves. In order to substitute the former, socially judging classification into theoretical science and practical art, J. G. Wallerius from Uppsala coined the term pure and applied chemistry in 1751. The idea behind this new conception was that it ought to be chemistry's research aim and not the kind of work, be it manual or intellectual, which was to decide about its branches and their dignity. The change in orientation which took place during the eighteenth century, and which is symbolized by the new dichotomy “pure and applied”, led towards a revaluation of the utilitarian aspects of chemistry. Its historical roots reach back to a long and fruitful cooperation of, and interaction between chemistry and economy, which was reinforced by the Stahlian tradition in Germany and Scandinavia. Subsequently, it was its strong economic bias that helped chemistry to become institutionalized and accepted as an academic discipline distinct from the medico-pharmaceutical profession. The analysis of this change of attitudes, behaviour and institutional pattern suggests that, at least during the period of institutionalization of this particular discipline, social structures and the intrinsic scientific contents are so tightly interrelated, that any division into “internal”, cognitive developments (facts, theory and subject-matter) and “external” conditions (social context and stategies of institutionalization) would be artificial, since they both constitute the scientific community as a context of argumentation and action. 相似文献