论推进马克思主义大众化的必要性

在新形势下推进马克思主义大众化是提高马克思主义认同度的需要;也是马克思主义大众化大众品质的要求;在新形势下推进马克思主义大众化具有理论和现实意义。     

中国特色社会主义文化发展道路坚持的原则——以毛泽东《在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话》为切入点

毛泽东发表于1942年的《在延安文艺座谈会上的讲话》是马克思主义中国化的成果之一,中国特色社会主义文化发展道路的建设不仅需要马克思主义基本理论的指导,更需要坚持马克思主义中国化最新成果的引领;坚持"二为"方向与"双百"方针相结合;尊重文化的发展规律,把握好政治、经济与文化的科学协调发展;坚持为人民群众搭建平台,发挥人民群众在文化创作中的主体作用;坚持处理好传承发展、与时俱进与开放包容的关系。     

关于科学认识马克思主义时代化的几点思考

科学认识马克思主义时代化对于切实推进马克思主义时代化进程,促进马克思主义的发展创新具有重要意义。科学认识马克思主义时代化要重点把握以下几个方面:时代化是马克思主义理论体系发展的内生性要求;科学认识和推动马克思主义时代化必须处理好坚持继承和发展创新的关系;要紧密结合新形势下我国社会主义建设的实际。     

马克思主义哲学之发展探微

马克思主义哲学是一种随着实践的发展而不断丰富的开放的体系,面对时代与科学的进步所带来的新问题与新挑战,我们要能发扬马克思主义哲学的反思与批判精神,以创新与发展的眼光来对待马克思主义哲学。在实践中将视线投向新领域,研究新问题,从而实现马克思主义与时俱进的品格,以便能更好地指导社会主义建设。     

当代中国马克思主义史学的研究特点与发展趋向

<正>从20世纪20—40年代唯物史观史学的形成和发展,到1949年后中国马克思主义史学居主导地位,再到改革开放后形成以唯物史观为主导的中国史学多元发展的态势,及至当代主流史学提出建立中国特色历史学的学科体系、学术体系和话语体系,中国马克思主义史学经过了从边缘到主流、从封闭到开放、从反思到继续探索的曲折发展过程。当代中国马克思主义史学发展的主要特点是什么？中国马克思主义史学研究在当代中国史学研究体系中处于何种样态？中国马克思主义史学如何适应新的时代发展趋势而在学术和现实中发挥作用？这些问题都需要及时总结和深入探讨。     

唯物史观的历史命运——关于马克思主义文本解读的思考

一个多世纪以来 ,马克思主义的传承和演化 ,都有其内在“文本”的原因与外在“解读”的动力。唯物史观之具有大限度的真理性与合理性 ,根本在于其最高原则与精神 ,即物质的统一性、发展演化的辩证性、人的主体性。它关于人类社会发展演化的模式彻底贯彻了上述原则 ,且具有基本概念上的合理抽象性与架构上的立体性、兼容性与张力。马克思主义理论及其唯物史观又是一个开放的理论系统。在新的世纪 ,唯物史观依旧是人类的主流思潮之一     

毛泽东思想与改革

以改革、开放和社会主义现代化建设为显特征的当代中国现实,是在和平与发展的时代主题以及经济全球化潮流的大背景下发生的。面对这些深刻变动中的现实,毛泽东思想仍然具有强大的生命力与恒久的指导意义。丁俊萍、王智在《马克思主义研究》2003     

当代中国马克思主义大众化的双重意义

推动当代中国马克思主义大众化是党的十七大提出的战略任务和历史使命。它体现了马克思主义的本质要求,具有实现马克思主义中国化和超越马克思主义苏联理解模式的理论诉求;同时,当代中国马克思主义大众化对全面建设小康社会,构建社会主义和谐社会,促进社会主义市场经济健康发展,加强社会主义意识形态建设和巩固党的执政地位等都具有重要的现实意义。当然,当代中国马克思主义大众化的理论诉求和现实意义不可分割,二者统一于中国特色社会主义建设的伟大实践中。     

中国马克思主义史学论析

<正>20世纪的中国史学,通常被划分为传统史学、近代史学和马克思主义史学三大流派,而马克思主义史学从孕育、形成到发展、转型,深刻地影响着中国史学的进程。研究中国马克思主义史学发展史,对于深入地探讨20世纪的中国史学,深切地认识和理解中国马克思主义或马克思主义中国化,都具有重要的学术意义。一、中国马克思主义史学概说中国马克思主义史学是以马克思主义为理论指导的中国史学,或者说是马克思主义在中国史学     

论侯外庐的学术道路

侯外庐是我国公认的老一辈马克思主义历史学家。他为中国马克思主义历史学的发展所做出的开拓性贡献 ,是与其走过的学术道路分不开的。他的学术道路具有开拓性的鲜明特点 ,从中可以领略到他的理论胆识、历史睿智和自强不息、不畏艰辛的“韧”的战斗精神。他走过的学术道路 ,可以分为三个时期 :奠定马克思主义理论基础的 2 0— 30年代 ;探索马克思主义与中国历史实际相结合具体途径、建设中国特色的历史科学体系的 4 0— 5 0年代 ;坚持真理、不断进取、回顾总结的 70— 80年代。它们始终贯串着一条主线 :以马克思主义的基本理论和基本方法为指导 ,在历史研究领域努力实现马克思主义的中国化 ,积极建设具有中国特色的马克思主义历史科学体系。他在历史研究领域所取得的科学成果 ,是马克思主义历史科学中国化的产物。     

中世纪晚期和近代早期欧洲的寡妇改嫁

在中世纪晚期和近代早期的欧洲 ,寡妇较多 ,她们改嫁的比率较高 ,再嫁者守寡时间较短。历史事实表明 ,寡妇对于是否改嫁的选择 ,不仅仅是个人行为 ,而且受客观条件的制约。当时欧洲较为开放的文化和舆论氛围 ,寡妇自身的财产和处置财产的权利 ,为她们改嫁提供了可能。而传统时代的经济体制和现实生活的艰辛也要求她们重组家庭。     

地方发展变迁与居民地方感关系研究——以广州荔枝湾涌历史文化街区为例

本文以广州荔枝湾涌历史文化街区为例,运用扎根理论研究荔枝湾涌1940年代以来地方发展变迁与居民地方感的关系,进而挖掘居民地方感变化机制。研究发现：荔枝湾涌居民的地方感主要受生态环境、建筑与配套服务、集体记忆、活动类型、人际关系等因素的影响,其中生态环境起主导性作用;积极地方感主要来源于集体记忆的保留与延续;消极地方感主要来源于破旧的居住环境及落后的配套服务;此外,文章提出内向型地方感和外向型地方感的概念,认为随着城市发展,在地方发展变迁过程中,地方感由内向型地方感转变为内向型和外向型相结合的地方感。两种地方感相互作用,互相调节,更有利于地方稳定、开放、包容地发展。     

Freedom of the city: Contemporary issues and policy influences on children and young people's use of public open space in England

Following a reflection of childhood experiences of public open spaces in daily life the paper moves on to a discussion about definitions of public open space. Contemporary policy related to children, young people and public open space in England are then identified. This context is addressed as policy which directly affects public open space and policy areas, drawn from other political drivers, which have an indirect influence on children and young people's use of public open space. There is some reference to evidence which has fed into some of these policy areas. Teenagers who are skateboarders are used as an example of one group of young people who experience other—legal, social and physical—controls on their use of public open space.     

Play Nice or Pick a Fight? Cooperation as an Interest Group Strategy at Implementation

The open, multilevel nature of U.S. policymaking enables interest group activity throughout the policy process. At policy implementation, groups attempt to secure benefits or ameliorate legislated effects by devising cooperative or conflictual strategies to influence outcomes, especially when agency officials have discretion to design rules and negotiate agreements. Investigating group “street‐level” activity with respect to the Endangered Species Act, this research finds that policy context and resources shape the degree of information and access available to groups, which influences the strategies groups adopt. Groups with access and specialized information will attempt to change or influence policy outcomes cooperatively. Groups with limited technical information are more likely to fight implementation.     

“Power to the people”: Contesting urban poverty and power inequities through open GIS

Geospatial technologies are central to spatial decision making and governance, but gaining equitable access to these is still difficult for traditionally marginalized communities. We contend that the dominance of proprietary GIS software has contributed to this digital divide, as these are inherently disempowering to marginalized social groups. Their high purchasing cost and licensing fees pose access barriers to resource‐poor citizens. Design of proprietary software may also not be appropriate for marginalized groups who are neither trained in GIS, nor represent the needs of dominant market base. Therefore, “free and open source software for geospatial” (FOSS4G) and open GIS provide new opportunities in democratizing GIS, as these are open code and free of purchasing and licensing costs. This paper aims to discuss the role of open GIS in advancing the goals of public participation GIS (PPGIS). We first discuss the origins of the FOSS movement, and explore the ways it has shaped the FOSS4G and open GIS movements. Next, we examine how a community information system built with open GIS software is being successfully utilized by an environmental organization in Milwaukee, to contest urban poverty. Our research demonstrates that open source GIS offers unique opportunities in advancing PPGIS research and practice.     

Open space preservation in an urbanization context

The objective of this paper is to address the question of open space preservation in an urbanization context. We study the possibility of preserving two different types of open spaces, namely, large open spaces at cities’ outskirts and small intraurban open spaces. Thus, we contribute to the debate of land sharing versus land sparing in an urban context. We analyze these questions by way of a theoretical microeconomic framework that takes into account both households’ preferences for open space and regulators’ interest in the preservation of natural habitat for biodiversity. We compare land use patterns at private equilibrium and when the social planner maximizes social welfare.     

改革开放是当代中国强国富民之路

党的十一届三中全会开创的新的历史时期是以改革开放为标志的。改革开放三十年的历程,表明改革开放不仅是中国特色社会主义道路的鲜明特色,也是决定当代中国前途和命运的关键抉择。只有坚持改革开放,才能保证党和国家发展进步的活力源泉,实现中华民族强国富民的伟大复兴。     

Public open space exposure measures in Australian health research: a critical review of the literature

Numerous studies have shown associations between public open space and a variety of health outcomes. Yet the extent to which firm conclusions and planning policy recommendations can be drawn from this body of work depends on how public open space availability has been measured and reported. Other researchers have highlighted potential issues with the way that public open space has been measured but have not systematically assessed the extent of this problem. This paper provides a comprehensive critical review of studies of public open space and health conducted in Australia to identify and compare public open space measurement and data treatment. Our analysis showed wide variation in how public open space was measured, as well as a lack of consistency in reporting public open space exposure measures and under‐reporting of measurement methods. We find that such tendencies limit how much these studies can be compared and contrasted with each other. The corollary of that finding is that without more detailed reporting of exposure measures, it will be difficult to establish an evidence base that informs planning for healthy, liveable environments. In response, we develop and present a checklist for reporting public open space exposure to address this challenge.     

Gendered mobilities and border-crossings: from Elbasan to Athens

The study of migratory movements, with all their changing features in the context of post-1989 political, economic and geographical restructurings, offers a prime site for reflection on the gendered meaning/s and content of mobilities and borders. Particularly in human geography, new questions and different approaches to established themes in migration research are elaborated in this ‘era of globalisation’. Negotiations of geographical and social borders and boundaries, the speed and ease of movement, but also gender inequalities in choice and cases of immobility and/or enclosure, emphasis on agency and the importance of space and place are some such themes and questions. This article is based on research with migrant women in Athens; it follows the trajectories of an Albanian woman from Elbasan to Athens as a starting point for the discussion of gendered practices and perceptions of migration, (im)mobility and border-crossings. In these trajectories, space is involved, in its material aspects but also in terms of representations and codings. Notions of place, local/global relations and gender identities are re-worked in the efforts to set up bearable everyday lives ‘here’, while maintaining links ‘there’. At the same time, ‘here’ (in Athens) and ‘there’ (in Elbasan) come out as open and temporary while borders are (re)produced, negotiated and challenged in multiple ways and at various spatial scales.     

Teaching critical open GIS

Higher-education geographic information system (GIS) curricula largely marginalize and separate instruction of critical GIS and open GIS, paralleling a divide between GIS and non-GIS in geography. GIS is typically represented as a singular, infallibly objective, and universally applicable technology. GIS generally dismisses the critiques from human geography, while critical human geography dismisses GIS for its association with positivism and unethical applications. Teaching critical open GIS may bridge this divide, creating a transformative pedagogical space for human geography to affectively and effectively engage with open GIS technology at the level of code. Critical open GIS students practice and critique GIS as conflicted insiders, bridging the divide between GIS and non-GIS in their geography education. Reviews of GIS curricula find support for teaching critical and open GIS, but reviews of texts and syllabi confirm their marginalization and separation. A new critical open GIS course is introduced, using GIS in development and political ecology as integrative frameworks.