共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 9 毫秒
1.
2.
《淮南子》是西汉初叶淮南王刘安主持撰写的一部重要学术著作,至今已两千一百多年,今存二十一卷。刘安是一个很有文化修养的人。他不仅善文辞,而且长于音乐,通晓天文地理、诸子学说,班固在《汉书》中说淮南王“好书,鼓琴,不喜弋猎狗马驰 相似文献
3.
《淮南子书》的由来《淮南子书》,从封建思想系统(所谓儒家道家法家体系)的观点看来,确是—部杂书。但从其历史背景及内容所反映的种种利益看来,又是一大块三稜镜。其中虽有不同的光色,但却参混着当时地主阶级中比较进步的阶层的要求在内。我们如能把其中比较进步的部分指出来,对于了解当时阶级斗争的复杂状况,对于汉初思想的研究,可能有不小帮助。 相似文献
4.
《中国地方志》2019,(3)
《淮南子》今存宋刊本,但惜其非善,高诱注更是脱讹满眼。《地形训》高诱注乃今存该篇唯一古注,明代学者刘绩依据《汉书·地理志》对该注多有补阙,清人庄逵吉、王念孙,今人刘文典、吴承仕、马宗霍、何宁、于大成、张双棣等学者勤力于此,多有创见,然仍有遗落之珠。《淮南子·地形训》高诱注是否有许慎注混淆和后人妄窜,自清代以来学界颇有争议。同出于高诱之手的《淮南子·地形训》注与《吕氏春秋·有始览》注存在诸多矛盾,注释重出于同卷、前后抵牾等低级错误表明,今本高诱注有后人妄窜的情况。作为汉代地理学成就的标志之一,高诱注存在明显的缺陷——因袭有余且考辨欠精,实地考察的缺失和经学思想的桎梏制约了他在地理学领域的造诣,远离文化中心和时局的混乱造成相关资料的匮乏,区划更新信息滞后等又为其增加了一点瑕疵。但作为《地形训》今存唯一古注,高诱注不仅有保存文献之功,更反映了汉代学者的地理认知,是研究汉代地理学的重要凭借。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
研究中国传统文化决不能忽略《淮南子》一书。它曾被唐代的刘知几说成“牢笼天地,博极古今”被胡适誉为“绝代奇书”、“集道家之大成”。陈广忠教授以孜孜以求的精神,二十年如一日地致力于《淮南子》和道家文化研究,结出了累累硕果,著有《淮南子译注》、《淮南子会考》、《刘安评传》、 相似文献
8.
傅亚庶 《古籍整理研究学刊》1994,(5)
《淮南子·时务篇》“赏有功”辨正傅亚庶《淮南子·时则篇》：“其令曰爵有德,赏有功,惠贤良、救饥渴,举力农、振贫穷,惠孤寡、忧罢疾……。”按：“赏有功”文殊不可通,“赏”当易为“禄”,“爵有德禄有功”相对为文。爵、禄原来是名词。爵指封建贵族的等级地位,... 相似文献
9.
郭沂先生在《〈淮南子.缪称训〉所见子思〈累德篇〉考》一文中指出,《淮南子.缪称训》除首尾两段为编者所加前言、后语外,其他部分是子思《累德篇》佚文。虽然《淮南子.缪称训》多处引用《子思子》,但其主体部分有很多语句明显是道家者语,不可能全部出自儒家书《子思子》。现有资料不能证明它的主体部分就是《累德篇》佚文。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
The Phaedrus is taken to be a portrayal of how individual souls struggle for their own salvation. Generally overlooked, however, is the fact that Plato here invites us to explore soul not as a principle of individuality, but of community and of an identity over and above individuality. The article argues for the presence and importance of non-individuality of soul in the Phaedrus by considering the roles in the text of erôs, the structure of the myth, arguments concerning soul as mover, tripartition of soul, the motif of Hestia, and central dramatic and rhetorical features. 相似文献
13.
Andreas Bock-Raming 《Indo-Iranian Journal》1990,33(4):241-257
Contrary to those similes which are constructed with the particles of comparison iva and yath, the samsopam has scarcely been investigated so far. Only M.-C. Porcher in her monograph titled Figures de Style en Sanskrit. Théories des Alamkrastra. Analyse de Poèmes de Vnkatdhvarin, Paris 1978, has dealt with this kind of upam separately. There are, however, no detailed investigations with respect to the use of the samsopam in the early kvya-literature. The samsopams occurring in avaghosa's Saundarananda and his Buddhacarita can generally be divided into the following categories:
The use of the samsopam in the S. and the B. shows some striking peculiarities: In a large number of occurrences they are connected with the abdlamkras anuprsa and ltnuprsa. Furthermore, they are often found in close vicinity to each other or occur together with the similes yath and iva which leads to a certain cumulative effect. Although in many instances the use of the s. in both kvyas can be described as rather conventional and stereotyped, there are some striking differences between the S. and the Sanskrit text of the B. In the latter kvya the number of s. of each category is twice or even thrice as large as in the respective categories in the S. Moreover, it can be shown that in the B. Avaghosa strives to make use of more ornate and elaborate forms of samsopam. Examples are a lesa-upam in B. 5,37a, and two compounds in B. 5,26b and d which are at the same time yathsamkhyas. 相似文献
| 1. | Compounds ending in an adjective like sama, tulya etc.: they are characterized by the omission of the common property. |
| 2. | Tatpurusa-compounds which are constructed according to Pnini II,1,55; they include the common property but have no particle of comparison. |
| 3. | Compounds of the type upamna + sama, tulya etc. + upameya; these compounds are characterized by the omission of the sdharmya. |
| 4. | bahuvrhi-compounds with the upamna as the first, the sdharmya as the second and the upameya as the third member. |
| 5. | bahuvrhi-compounds containing the upamna and the upameya only. |
| 6. | bahuvrhi-compounds constructed according to Ktyyana's Vrttika, in which three elements of which a simile consists are missing: the sdharmya, the particle of comparison and the upamna. |
14.
15.
16.
Karl Hoffmann 《Indo-Iranian Journal》1960,4(2-3):119-120
17.
18.
19.