Commentary

Comments on Margolis, "The Presidential Campaign and the Future of Election Studies" Heinz Eulau Stanford University

Rejoinder to Heinz Eulau's Commentary Michael Margolis University of Pittsburgh

The Congress, the President and Public Policy: A Rejoinder to Joseph Cooper Michael L. Mezey DePaul University     

方志评论存在问题举要

文章认为,方志评论意义重大,而目前方志评论存在溢美、以点代面、离题、妄下定论、就志论志、空评空论、画蛇添足和重篇目轻正文等方面的问题。     

董元醇述论

1861年9月10日,山东道监察御史董元醇所上《奏请皇太后权理朝政并另简亲王辅政折》,引发了震惊晚清朝野的滔天巨浪,真可谓是大名鼎鼎。但除此之外,学界对其则知之甚少。其实,董元醇科举入仕后,先入翰林,后授山东道监察御史,本是清廷一个不稂不莠的中级官员。辛酉政变后,董元醇虽多次上书言事,力图能够再次引起最高统治者的关注,但却未得到清廷的重任,很快匿迹于政坛,实属不起眼的小人物。     

Struggling Pasts: A Commentary

This commentary is organized into three parts. The first discusses the papers presented in this volume, notably divided into two themes: those that looked at past struggles and those that look at struggling in the present. The second part deals more critically with the unifying analytical theme of the papers: a dialectical approach to historical archaeology and how it can be implemented through the theory of internal relations. The final section of this commentary takes this idea and applies it to the archaeology of landscape and the production of social space.