共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Johanna Geyer-Kordesch 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1987,10(4):195-205
The objective mode of scientific inquiry has increasingly been called into question especially within feminist theory. I have tried to introduce two methodological approaches in examing a small area of medical opinion-making in the medical press at a period in which the question of women doctors was being discussed, but very few women doctors were actually practicing in Germany. Methodologically feminist history sees gender as a structural component used to ascribe sexual division of labour and to form concepts of “masculinity” and “femininity” in a society. It does not define “women's history” as a separate sphere additive to other traditional areas of historical writing including history of science. The second methodological approach is that of deconstruction: “objective” statements in medicine and the biological sciences are part of social and cultural preconceptions. I have examined the pattern of unreflected scientific statements about women's claims to want to become doctors. The pattern is one of preventive prejudice: representative doctors wrote about women in physiological and biological terms of being “weak” and “unfit”. This was an effective strategy for maintaining a status quo of dequalification. The historical examination of women entering the professions has not so much to do with their own capacities, but rather with socially conceived forms of argumentation indirectly applied: preventive statements in medicine about biological function, the “weaker” sex, intellectual denigration, physiological determinism. Some of the statements I found are amusing, but the humour becomes bitter when the consequences enter our social consciousness. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
Rezensionen
Nationalatlas Gesellschaft und Staat 相似文献5.
6.
7.
8.
Katrin Bhme 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》2001,24(4):271-283
The article deals with the foundation and development of the society Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde zu Berlin in the 18th and 19th centuries, its position as a privat society for natural history in Berlin, and its relation to Freemasonry. The paper shows the change of meaning of these society, especially after the foundation of the Berlin university in 1810. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Franz Weiling 《Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte》1985,8(4):253-253
17.
18.
19.