开发区:立创新驱动战略 促高新技术发展(上)

正创新是推动一个国家和民族向前发展的重要力量,也是推动整个人类社会向前发展的重要力量。面对全球新一轮科技革命与产业变革的重大机遇和挑战,面对经济发展新常态下的趋势变化和特点,面对实现"两个一百年"奋斗目标的历史任务和要求,必须深化体制机制改革,加快实施创新驱动发展战略。——中共中央国务院关于深化体制机制改革加快实施创新驱动发展战略的若干意见     

凝聚科技资源 服务转型升级——创新驱动助力工程总结交流会召开

<正>4月13日—14日,中国科协在浙江省宁波市召开创新驱动助力工程总结交流会,围绕深入实施创新驱动发展战略,总结中国科协创新驱动助力工程工作新做法,交流新经验,推广新模式,深入谋划创新驱动助力工程的未来发展方向,打造"创新驱动助力工程"升级版。     

甘肃省写生基地建设与乡村文旅资源保护研究

文旅资源保护是写生基地产业发展的根本,是实现文旅产业兴旺的基础。甘肃省写生基地发展立足于乡村振兴战略,依托本省优厚的文旅资源,以一系列科学有效的措施,大力推进文旅资源保护和开发利用,开展乡村优秀传统文化艺术的传承与弘扬,推动文化赋能,培育资源优势,打造特色文旅,充分发挥文旅产业激发和辐射效能,推进文旅产业的拓展和产业链的延伸,推动以写生基地产业为抓手的乡村文旅产业大发展。     

河南省可持续发展实验区现状分析与对策研究

我国可持续发展实验区(以下简称"实验区"),是为实施科教兴国和国家可持续发展战略的实践基地,旨在通过机制创新和科学技术推广与应用,促进经济快速发展和社会进步、环境相互和谐.实验区的建设对推动区域经济可持续发展,起到了良好的示范作用,但仍然有制度设计存在缺陷、创新驱动发展能力不足、能力建设滞后等方面问题.在新的历史发展阶...     

基于“新发展理念”的黄河流域高质量发展路径研究

新时代背景下,推动黄河流域地区高质量发展是关系国家发展全局的重大战略。以"新发展理念"为引领是推动黄河流域实现一体化高质量发展的重要抓手。黄河流域地区要实现高质量发展,需要在"新发展理念"的基础上建立整体性协同发展体系,在实现现代化治理体系与协商机制上,走培育创新驱动体系、完善核心城市群协同发展机制、强化生态环境保护体系、构建内陆腹地城市开放新格局、优化城市公共服务供给与保障体系的道路,从而推动黄河流域地区实现可持续健康发展。     

申达集团有限公司

公司成立于1985年,是主要从事软塑包装新材料生产经营,并正在向酒店、房产、化工等领域多元发展的国家级大型民营企业集团。20多年来,集团始终坚持围绕包装主业进行科技创新与制度创新,打造了一个以上市公司"江苏中达新材料集团股份有限公司"(股票代码:600074)为核心的包装产业集群。在江阴,拥有2平方公里的"中国软塑包装材料生产基地"园区和1平方公里的"亚洲包装制造中心"园区,     

国家高新区功能演化与发展对策研究——以南京高新区为例

本文以南京高新技术产业开发区为例,分析了高新区的功能演化过程及其动力机制。根据国家高新区建设创新型园区的战略目标和南京高新技术产业开发区"二次创业"的功能定位,提出高新区应该坚持城市化、集聚化、内外资并重三大战略路径,积极实施产业集聚与优化、总部基地经济战略等五大战略,推进高新区功能的持续发展和提升。     

论“中国梦”之文化强国

文化强则中国强,文化强国是实现"中国梦"的重要支撑。作为国家发展的战略性纲领,建设文化强国已被写入党的十八大报告,要贯彻文化强国战略,必须着力建设社会主义核心价值体系,着力完善公共文化服务体系,着力推动文化产业新发展,着力打造文化精品,着力提高中国文化影响力。     

培植基层基础工作根基 推动方志事业创新发展

正近年来,在省委、省政府重视支持和中指组及其办公室关心指导下,福建省方志委转变观念、着力创新,聚焦问题、拓展思路,以落实依法治志为主线,谋划长远发展、完善体制机制,突出志鉴主业、着力提质提速,着眼队伍建设、提升综合素质,注重发挥省级方志机构以上率下作用,示范带动、创新驱动、引领推动,加强全省地方志系统的基层基础工作,逐步形成以修志编鉴为主     

东北老工业基地信息化战略研究

以信息化带动工业化,以工业化促进信息化,是我国今后二十年内实现工业化的必由之路,今年是实施信息化带动工业化战略的启动年,东北地区是我国重要的老工业基地,本文以东北老工业基地作为实证研究,提出东北老工业基地信息化发展战略,对于研究信息化带动工业化的战略具有典型意义。     

Bringing Development Back into Development Studies

This article challenges Horner and Hulme's call to move from ‘international development’ to ‘global development’ with a reaffirmation of the classical traditions of development studies. With some adaptation to fit the changing contemporary context, these traditions not only remain relevant but also recover vital insights that have been obscured in the various fashionable re‐imaginings of development. In particular, development thinking and agendas in the past were much more radical and ambitious in addressing the imperatives of redistribution and progressive forms of transformation in the context of stark asymmetries of wealth and power. Such ambition is still needed to address the nature and scale of challenges that continue to face the bulk of countries in the world, particularly given the persistence if not deepening of asymmetries. This reaffirmation is elaborated by addressing three major weaknesses in Horner and Hulme's arguments. First, they do not actually define development, but instead treat it as simply poverty and inequality dynamics, which are better understood as outcomes rather than causes. Second, despite their assertion that the study of (international) development was primarily concerned with between‐country inequalities, this is not true. Domestic inequality was in fact central to both development theory and policy since the origins of the field. Third, the authors ignore the rise of neoliberalism from the late 1970s onwards and the profound crisis that this caused to development outside of East Asia and perhaps India, which the jargon of ‘global’ implicitly obfuscates and even condones. Rather, the experiences of East Asia and in particular China arguably vindicate classical approaches in development studies.     

Development Reconsidered; New Directions in Development Thinking

This paper offers broad and critical perspectives on current development thinking. A brief summary of different meanings of development and a thumbnail sketch of broad trends over the past twenty to thirty years in relation to major development indicators is followed by a discussion of reasons for the emergence of fundamental critiques of conventional development and developmentalism from perspectives known variously as post-structuralist, post-development and anti-development. Connections are made between these and the literatures on post-modernism, postcolonialism and post-traditionalism. Finally, the implications of these rapid paradigm shifts and changing realities for future research, teaching and action across the South/North divide are considered.     

Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations

Sociological studies of organizational fashions tend to focus on commercial firms. This article looks at the Capacity Development concept that is globally applied as a model in governmentally supported development assistance organizations. The organizations themselves adopt the concept, asserting that an increase in ‘capacities’ in developing countries will contribute to a higher success rate for projects. This article argues that a primary function of concepts such as Capacity Development is to meet the legitimacy requirements of development assistance organizations. The more the effectiveness of these organizations is criticized or challenged, the more they feel the need to defend themselves by developing new — and hopefully more effective — concepts.     

2016·筑梦开发区(中)

中国开发区已走过32多年的历程,其诞生与发展对外顺应国际竞争和新科技革命的发展潮流,对内强力促进区域经济发展,对外提高国家综合竞争力,助力中国实现从落后的农业国家到世界第二大经济体的华丽变身.     

Fast-Track Agricultural Development

Ｆａｓｔ－Ｔｒａｃｋ　Ａｇｒｉｃｕｌｔｕｒａｌ　ＤｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔＦａｓｔ－ＴｒａｃｋＡｇｒｉｃｕｌｔｕｒａｌＤｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔ￥ＢＥＮＧＹＩ＆ＧＡＲＭＡＣｅｒｉｎｇＳａｍｚｈｕｂ,ｖｉｃｅ－ｃｈａｉｒｍａｎｏｆｔｈｅｐｅｏｐｌｅ＇ｓｇｏｖｅ...     

2016·筑梦开发区(下)

<正>开发区的发展已经进入一个经济转型升级的全新阶段,发展机遇千载难逢且稍纵即逝,发展依然是时不我待,依然需要在审慎稳妥地把握好宏观大局的前提下,发扬敢闯敢试的精神,推动经济全面、协调、可持续地发展。随着开放的不断深化,国家之间进一步的经贸往来需要更高层次的承载平台。在国际合作和开发区发展新常态中,中外合作产业园建设能契合多方共同的需求。在这样的背景下,