开发区 立创新驱动战略 促高新技术发展(下)

正以创新驱动为引领,着力打造全国"智慧城市"示范基地;以创新驱动为引领,着力打造全国超高分子新材料生产基地……近段时间以来,"创新"成为了开发区最火热的字眼,一场新的蝶变正在开发区揭开帷幕。创新始终是推动国家、民族向前发展的重要力量。我国是一个发展中大国,正在大力推进经济发展方式转变和经济结构调整,必须把创新驱动发展战略实施好。实施创新驱动发展战略,就是要推动以科技创新为核心的全面创     

论科学技术是生产力的历史观

坚持科学技术是生产力论断,实施创新驱动发展战略,不断深化科技体制改革,推动科技和经济紧密结合,加快建设国家创新体系,强化基础研究、前沿技术研究,提高科学研究水平和成果转化能力,抢占科技发展战略制高点。     

跨越·科技创造新未来

跨越式 科技是梦想的翅膀 党的十八大明确提出要实施创新驱动发展战略,强调科技创新是提高社会生产力综合国力的战略支撑,必须摆在国家发展全局的核心位置。     

河南省可持续发展实验区现状分析与对策研究

我国可持续发展实验区(以下简称"实验区"),是为实施科教兴国和国家可持续发展战略的实践基地,旨在通过机制创新和科学技术推广与应用,促进经济快速发展和社会进步、环境相互和谐.实验区的建设对推动区域经济可持续发展,起到了良好的示范作用,但仍然有制度设计存在缺陷、创新驱动发展能力不足、能力建设滞后等方面问题.在新的历史发展阶...     

基于“新发展理念”的黄河流域高质量发展路径研究

新时代背景下,推动黄河流域地区高质量发展是关系国家发展全局的重大战略。以"新发展理念"为引领是推动黄河流域实现一体化高质量发展的重要抓手。黄河流域地区要实现高质量发展,需要在"新发展理念"的基础上建立整体性协同发展体系,在实现现代化治理体系与协商机制上,走培育创新驱动体系、完善核心城市群协同发展机制、强化生态环境保护体系、构建内陆腹地城市开放新格局、优化城市公共服务供给与保障体系的道路,从而推动黄河流域地区实现可持续健康发展。     

推进黑龙江省科技创新服务体系建设的思考

<正>当前,我国正处在全面建成小康社会的关键时期和深化改革开放、加快转变经济发展方式的攻坚时期。国际金融危机深层次影响仍在持续,科技在经济社会发展中的作用日益凸显,国际科技竞争与合作不断加强,新科技革命和全球产业变革步伐加快,我国科技发展既面临重要战略机遇,也面临严峻挑战。面对新形势新要求,我国自主创新能力还不够强,科技体制机制与经济社会发展和国际竞争的要求不相适应,影响我国综合实力和国际竞争力的提升。综合竞争力决定于科技创新能力,科技创新服务体系在科技创新过程     

推进文化体制机制创新

制约文化科学发展的体制机制障碍尚未完全破除。推进文化体制机制创新,是进一步深化改革的重要方面。深化文化体制改革,推进文化体制机制创新,十八届三中全会做出了重要部署。     

鄱阳湖生态经济区的生态产业发展分析

国务院指出,要把鄱阳湖区生态经济区规划的实施作为应对国际金融危机、贯彻区域发展总体战略、保护鄱阳湖"一湖清水"的重大举措,促进发展方式根本性转变,推动这一地区科学发展。国务院要求,鄱阳湖生态经济区规划实施要以促进生态和经济协调发展为主线,以体制创新和科技进步为动力,转变发展方式,创新发展途径,加快发展步伐,努力把鄱阳湖地区建设成为全国乃至世界级生态经济示范区。本文就是以此为目的进行研究。     

习近平总书记关于科技创新重要论述的三维解析

面对新一轮世界科技革命和产业变革的孕育兴起,以习近平同志为核心的党中央立足新时代中国社会深层次的、根本性的历史性变革,从时代发展前沿和国家战略高度,围绕“创新是引领发展的第一动力”这一重要论断,贯穿改革、自信和引领这三个重要的维度,从理论与实践的结合上,续写了中国特色社会主义科技理论的新篇章。     

漫谈“文化强国”战略

最近,中共十七届六中全会审议通过的《中共中央关于深化文化体制改革推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣若干重大问题的决定》(以下简称《决定》),提出了"建设社会主义文化强国"的战略目标。"文化强国"战略和国家整体战略是相互依存的。"文化强     

Bringing Development Back into Development Studies

This article challenges Horner and Hulme's call to move from ‘international development’ to ‘global development’ with a reaffirmation of the classical traditions of development studies. With some adaptation to fit the changing contemporary context, these traditions not only remain relevant but also recover vital insights that have been obscured in the various fashionable re‐imaginings of development. In particular, development thinking and agendas in the past were much more radical and ambitious in addressing the imperatives of redistribution and progressive forms of transformation in the context of stark asymmetries of wealth and power. Such ambition is still needed to address the nature and scale of challenges that continue to face the bulk of countries in the world, particularly given the persistence if not deepening of asymmetries. This reaffirmation is elaborated by addressing three major weaknesses in Horner and Hulme's arguments. First, they do not actually define development, but instead treat it as simply poverty and inequality dynamics, which are better understood as outcomes rather than causes. Second, despite their assertion that the study of (international) development was primarily concerned with between‐country inequalities, this is not true. Domestic inequality was in fact central to both development theory and policy since the origins of the field. Third, the authors ignore the rise of neoliberalism from the late 1970s onwards and the profound crisis that this caused to development outside of East Asia and perhaps India, which the jargon of ‘global’ implicitly obfuscates and even condones. Rather, the experiences of East Asia and in particular China arguably vindicate classical approaches in development studies.     

Development Reconsidered; New Directions in Development Thinking

This paper offers broad and critical perspectives on current development thinking. A brief summary of different meanings of development and a thumbnail sketch of broad trends over the past twenty to thirty years in relation to major development indicators is followed by a discussion of reasons for the emergence of fundamental critiques of conventional development and developmentalism from perspectives known variously as post-structuralist, post-development and anti-development. Connections are made between these and the literatures on post-modernism, postcolonialism and post-traditionalism. Finally, the implications of these rapid paradigm shifts and changing realities for future research, teaching and action across the South/North divide are considered.     

Capacity Development as the Model for Development Aid Organizations

Sociological studies of organizational fashions tend to focus on commercial firms. This article looks at the Capacity Development concept that is globally applied as a model in governmentally supported development assistance organizations. The organizations themselves adopt the concept, asserting that an increase in ‘capacities’ in developing countries will contribute to a higher success rate for projects. This article argues that a primary function of concepts such as Capacity Development is to meet the legitimacy requirements of development assistance organizations. The more the effectiveness of these organizations is criticized or challenged, the more they feel the need to defend themselves by developing new — and hopefully more effective — concepts.     

2016·筑梦开发区(中)

中国开发区已走过32多年的历程,其诞生与发展对外顺应国际竞争和新科技革命的发展潮流,对内强力促进区域经济发展,对外提高国家综合竞争力,助力中国实现从落后的农业国家到世界第二大经济体的华丽变身.     

Fast-Track Agricultural Development

Ｆａｓｔ－Ｔｒａｃｋ　Ａｇｒｉｃｕｌｔｕｒａｌ　ＤｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔＦａｓｔ－ＴｒａｃｋＡｇｒｉｃｕｌｔｕｒａｌＤｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔ￥ＢＥＮＧＹＩ＆ＧＡＲＭＡＣｅｒｉｎｇＳａｍｚｈｕｂ,ｖｉｃｅ－ｃｈａｉｒｍａｎｏｆｔｈｅｐｅｏｐｌｅ＇ｓｇｏｖｅ...     

2016·筑梦开发区(下)

<正>开发区的发展已经进入一个经济转型升级的全新阶段,发展机遇千载难逢且稍纵即逝,发展依然是时不我待,依然需要在审慎稳妥地把握好宏观大局的前提下,发扬敢闯敢试的精神,推动经济全面、协调、可持续地发展。随着开放的不断深化,国家之间进一步的经贸往来需要更高层次的承载平台。在国际合作和开发区发展新常态中,中外合作产业园建设能契合多方共同的需求。在这样的背景下,