当代西方视野下的中国传统史学——读《世鉴:中国传统史学》

在海外,尤其是西方汉学和中国学研究领域中,其中一个重要分支就是对于中国传统史学的研究与关注,尽管迄今为止其成就似乎并不如其它领域。伍安祖、王晴佳合著的《世鉴:中国传统史学》①是英文世界出版的最新而系统论述中国传统史学史的著作,此书位列2006年美国亚洲研究书籍畅销书榜第九名,并被全美图书馆杂志《选择》(Choice)赋予杰出学术著作称号。西方迄今为止,并没有系统深入介绍中国史学史的著作。英语世界对于中国史学史的研究从未真正繁荣过,相关论著只是偶尔有之。1938年,嘉德纳(Charles Gardner)出版了第一部较系统的百余页的著作,书名为《中国传统史学》(Chinese Traditional Historiography)②。1955年,韩玉珊(Yu-shan Han)出版了《中国史学基础》(Elements of Chinese Historiography)③,1961年,浦立本(E.G.Pulleyblank)和比斯利(W.G.Beasley)等编辑了《中日史家》(Historians ofChina andJapan)④,一部有关中日传统史学的论文集。1975年王赓武等编辑了《中国历史资料论文集...     

Written Differently: A Survey of Commonwealth Constitutional History in the Age of Decolonisation

ABSTRACT

This article provides a survey and definition of the field of Commonwealth constitutional history since 1918, especially during and after global decolonisation. It asks what is Commonwealth constitutional history and how it differs from its English and Imperial counterparts. The article puts forward a working definition of Commonwealth constitutional history and introduces key and diverse writers who illustrate the range and potential of this history. The article provides an historiography and survey of constitutional history in the Pre-Commonwealth and Post-war Commonwealth periods while also assessing the opportunities of Post-British Commonwealth constitutional history. The objective of this article is to show how Commonwealth constitutional history can contribute to the historical study of state power and to see its worth to other disciplines and fields of history. Commonwealth constitutional history is a necessity to examine the politics, power and consequences of the British empire during the long age of decolonisation.     

2004年清史论文索引

一、总论2002年日本史学界关于明清史的研究[日]中岛乐章,张玉林译中国史研究动态2004:122003年清史研究概况刘景莲中国史研究动态2004:7美国清史资料及其研究情况述略(上)、(下)朱政惠中国史研究动态2004:1、2004:2日本史学界的明清“绅士论”郝秉键清史研究2004:4世界历史上的大清帝国何芳川史学理论研究2004:1对清代君主专制制度的几点看法李世瑜河南大学学报(社科)2004:3从康雍乾三帝对督抚的简用谈清代的专制皇权刘凤云河南大学学报(社科)2004:3清王朝崩溃的政治学分析林志友中州学刊2004:4《清史》纂修与历史编撰的创新陈其泰郭成康历…     

2004年中国近代史论著目录

论文一、总论、专题2002年中国近代史研究概况·虞和平·近代史研究,420世纪中国的社会转型与社会变革的两种思想和方式·李云峰·安徽史学,520世纪中国的社会转型与评价·郭德宏·史学月刊,721世纪中国近现代史研究的若干趋势·马敏·史学月刊,6中国近代史的再认识·姜涛·安徽史学,2关于中国现代化史研究的新思考·虞和平·史学月刊,6中国现代化延误的启示·尹正萍·江西社会科学,4论近代中国现代化的缓慢发展·程美东·江淮论坛,3关于新世纪中国近代史研究如何深入的思考·彭南生·史学月刊,6关于中国近代民族关系史研究的几点思考·彭武…     

《中国边疆史地研究》2004年总目录

特　稿中国疆域的形成与发展马大正 ( 3·1 )“东北工程”与中国东北史的研究李国强 ( 4·1 )边疆学理论传统夷夏观与中国疆域的形成———中国疆域形成理论探讨之一李大龙 ( 1·1 )“边疆”一词在世界主要法系中的镜像 :一个语源学角度的考察张世明 ( 2·1 )中华疆域观念与历代边疆政策———以东北疆域为例张碧波 ( 2·1 2 )边政研究两汉国家边防战略思想的发展及其主要特征黄今言 ( 1·1 5)至元末元军征黎时间考辨王献军 ( 1·2 7)蒙藏事务局与民国初年的边疆治理论析孙宏年 ( 1·3 0 )绿营兵与清代的西南边疆秦树才 ( 2·2 2 )论清末东…     

朱正元与《御览图》:晚清地图史的视角

许多翻译、改绘、新绘的中国海图在晚清出现,《御览江浙闽沿海图》(以下简称《御览图》)就是其中之一。已有研究对该图评价较高,但相关成果侧重制图技术的考辨,该图编纂的时代背景、朱正元在编纂中所担负的角色尚待厘清,而这些对于理解该图的历史地位同样至关重要。本文在考查《御览图》及其图说产生背景和经过后认为,正是在西方测绘技术的进步和清政府面临海上威胁背景下,洋务运动中兴起的西学教育培养了朱正元等测绘人才。而朱正元基于英版海图测绘和编纂的《御览图》融科学性和实用性于一体,是晚清作为中国海图由传统转向近代重要阶段的标志之一。     

一迭被世纪风云湮没的宁国府谕札

广德发现的清咸丰五至七年宁国府谕札是太平天国天京事变前后太平军皖南军事活动的倒影。五折谕札再现了太平军攻陷徽州、战略放弃芜湖,后又败走宁国府的三次战事,反映了太平军在天京事变前后军事形势的变化,清政府在军事、政治、经济上所受到的沉重打击,各反动势力之间由此而产生的深刻矛盾。从一个侧面说明革命领导集团的分裂、各反动势力的疯狂反扑是太平天国革命失败的主要原因。这五折谕札具有重要的历史价值。     

The Commonwealth and the Oath of Allegiance Crisis: A Study in Inter-War Commonwealth Relations

Recent historical treatment of Anglo-Irish relations in the 1930s has overlooked the complex nature of the legal disagreements between the two countries during that period. This article provides an account of some of the fundamental points of legal disagreement between the countries. It explains how differences of opinion as to the structure of intra-commonwealth constitutional relations led to conflict between the British government and that of the Irish Free State, with particular reference to the oath of allegiance crisis. It considers how other commonwealth countries saw these points of conflict. It concludes with a re-appraisal of the roles of Lord Hailsham and de Valera in Anglo-Irish relations, as examples of differing attitudes towards the commonwealth relationship.     

An Archaeology of History: The Wang Mang Nine Temples from Early Imperial China as Reconstructed by History and by Archaeology

In this paper, I examine the relationship between the construction of history by the textual history of early imperial China and by Chinese archaeology in the second half of the twentieth century, considering how these two fields of scholarship were directed by ideologies of the Chinese government. The locus for this investigation is the complex of imperial ancestral temples constructed by the emperor Wang Mang (r. 9–23 CE) for his brief interregnum dynasty. Although this group of buildings is described in the official dynastic history, compiled only fifty years after its construction, as having nine temple buildings with specific ancestors ascribed to each, its archaeological excavation in the late 1950s instead revealed twelve temples in a carefully organized plan. The discrepancy between the original construction of the temple complex and its subsequent revision in textual history is revealing in terms of the relationship between received tradition and individual action in the context of establishing imperial legitimacy, whereas the modern attempts to reconcile the discrepancy between textual history and excavated history are indicative of the relationship between Chinese archaeology of that period and the nationalist revision of history.