共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 687 毫秒
1.
“述而不作”的本义是对理论、学说而言。首轮修志提倡“述而不作”,但事实上也是“述而有作”,大述而小作。“述而有作”不是矫揉造作,必须是资料的仓理延伸。“述而有作”就是要增强志书的述性,增强述性的前提是消化资料。 相似文献
2.
一孔子是我国历史上儒家学派的创始人,但是这个儒家之“儒”应当如何说解,目前看法,仍有分歧。胡适说:“需”字古与“耎”相通,《广雅·释诂》:“耎,弱也。”“耎”即今“软”字,因而他主张儒是“外貌表示文弱迂缓的人”,并说“儒是柔懦之人。”郭沫若则说:“儒之本意诚然是柔,但不是由于他们本是奴隶而习于服从精神的柔,而是由于本是贵族而不事生产的筋骨的柔。古 相似文献
3.
梅显懋 《古籍整理研究学刊》2007,(1):36-38
孔子语子贡曰:“予一以贯之”的含义,大体有两种意见:一是孔子强调其学说是由一个最根本的道理贯穿着的。宋儒多主此说。二是孔子强调其学知都体现在行事之中。清儒多主此说。二说之误皆在混此句与孔子语曾子“吾道一以贯之”为同义,因此,前说明显不合此句语境;后说虽揭出“行事”之义,但仍拘牵于孔子语曾子句的语义,弃“贯”本义(贯穿)而用借义(行事),有滥用通假,顾此失彼之嫌。正确解释当为:我(孔子)用躬行(道德实践)来贯穿获得学识才干的过程。 相似文献
4.
述而不作的本义是对理论、学说而言。首轮修志提倡述而不作,但事实上是述而有作,大述而小作。述而有作不是矫揉造作,而是资料运用的合理延伸。述而有作就是要增强志书的述性。增强述性的前提是消化资料。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
刘景纯 《中国历史地理论丛》2004,19(1)
“乱流”是《水经注》载述水流的普通用语 ,据初步统计 ,4 0卷注有 2 8卷中都不同程度有“乱流”的说法 ,总数约 80余处。但“乱流”的含义是什么 ?什么样的流水形态称之为乱流 ?注释家解说的很少。包括今人的理解在内 ,大致可概括为二说 :一释作“正绝流”,亦即“直着横渡江河”;二释作“散流”或“失去主河道而注入类沼泽地的水流”形态。以上两种解释均不符合“乱流”本义 ,不符合《水经注》“乱流”的流水形态。《水经注》所出现的“乱流”几乎都出自两水或两水以上支流相会以后 ,约有以下几种形式 :1.(某水 )注于 (某水 ) ,乱流……。… 相似文献
8.
关于《春秋》性质的再思考 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
孔子所作的《春秋》是一部什么性质的著作?从战国之际的孟子、苟子,直到两汉时期的司马迁、班固等人都持有相同的观点,即认为它是一部蕴含作者“微言大义”的政治学著作。《孟子&;#183;滕文公下》说:“世衰道微,邪说暴行有作,臣弑其君者有之,子弑其父者有之。孔子惧,作《春秋》。《春秋》,天子之事也。是故孔子日:‘知我者其惟《春秋》乎?罪我者其惟《春秋》乎?’……昔者禹抑洪水而天下平,周公兼夷狄、驱猛兽而百姓宁,孔子成《春秋》而乱臣贼子瞑。”这是说孔子有鉴于春秋末年世道人心的衰坏, 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
This article is a comment on: Tubridge et al., 2012. Decennial reflections on a ‘geography of heritage’ (2000). International Journal of Heritage Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2012.695038 相似文献
14.
15.
Carl‐Axel Moberg 《Norwegian Archaeological Review》2013,46(1):22-26
The question of when and how fanning was introduced in the north of Norway has for decades been entangled with the hypothesis of a teutonic immigration in the Early Iron Age. New evidence ‐ mainly pollen analytical results ‐ takes away the basis for the immigration hypothesis. Both animal husbandry and barley growing originate in the neolithic periods. Although artifacts and intentional deposits of south Scandinavian types are comparatively few, important parallels are seen with Hordaland, west Norway, especially in the late Middle Neolithic Period. In the establishment and early development of farming in the North no doubt diffusional processes were at work, but small scale immigrations may also have occurred. 相似文献
16.
17.
十二卷本<剪灯丛话>是一个罕见的文言小说选本.陈良瑞在<文学遗产增刊>第十八集、程毅中在<文献>1990年第2期先后撰文考述.然而,书前武林虞淳熙的题辞并没有得到学界应有的重视,惟程毅中先生称:"这本书没有编辑者的姓名,但书前有一篇武林虞淳熙的题辞,称编者为'自好子'.……如果不是刻书人冒名假托的话,那么自好子编辑<剪灯丛话>的时间大约在万历、天启年间.因此董康和戴不凡把<剪灯丛话>定为明刻本还是有根据的."很明显,虞淳熙题辞的真伪对于判定<剪灯丛话>的成书有重要启示. 相似文献
18.
鉴书喻理与世事人情之相容兼得--介绍几则地方志藏书题记 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
在整理馆藏方志文献时,笔者得观几则清代、民国学者所留的藏书题记.这些或长或短的文字,不仅说明了某一文献的内容、刻印及流传情况,也反映了与刻印及流传相伴而行的世事与人情,是一个个生动具体的历史片断和一幅幅蕴含丰富的艺术画面.兹分别予以必要的介绍说明. 相似文献
19.
The court sites in south‐west Norway are a key material for discussing aspects of Roman period archaeology. So far, the Stand der Forschung is not satisfactory, mainly because the excavations that took place in the middle of the 20th century have not so far led to more systematic and synthesising studies being undertaken. It is argued in the article that the court sites can be considered indicative of central settlements in the Roman period, and that the sites were multifunctional. They probably served as gathering places for social activities like games, things and ritual, as production sites, and maybe as temporary accommodation for chieftains' retinues playing a role in intra‐Norwegian or perhaps Scandinavian military confrontations. The latter aspect is considered in some detail in the article, and it is suggested that the court site organisation is indicative of a Roman period (petty) south‐west Norwegian kingdom, and that the bog offering in Illerup place A might have originated from a south‐west Norwegian army defeated by ‘Danish’ forces. On an international level the court sites are an unparalleled type of archaeological monument reflecting social and functional aspects of general interest for European archaeology. 相似文献
20.