| "故事"与"古史":贯通20世纪二三十年代 "疑古"和"释古"的一条道路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王东杰. "故事"与"古史":贯通20世纪二三十年代 "疑古"和"释古"的一条道路[J]. 近代史研究, 2009, 0(2) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王东杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学历史文化学院,成都,610064 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 一般认为20世纪二三十年代"疑古"与"释古"两条学术路向分别代表了破坏古史和重建古史两条不同的路线。这一看法大体成立。但二者在观念上也有不少相通乃至相同的地方。一方面,"重建派"学者在研究中也运用了与顾颉刚非常相似的"层累说"观察古史的构成,而历史研究中的"故事眼光"更成为贯穿"疑古"和"释古"的一条道路。另一方面,"疑古派"在辨伪过程中也发展出来一些与"重建派"非常相似的具有建设意义的观念,但因其给人留下的"破坏"的形象过强而被忽视了。
|
| 关 键 词： | 古史辨 疑古 释古 层累地造成的古史说 |
"Narrative" and "Ancient History" : The Link between "Doubting Antiquity" and "Interpreting Antiquity" in the 1920s and 1930s |
| |
| Wang Dongjie. "Narrative" and "Ancient History" : The Link between "Doubting Antiquity" and "Interpreting Antiquity" in the 1920s and 1930s[J]. Modern Chinese History Studies, 2009, 0(2) |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Dongjie |
| |
| Abstract: | Conventionally,the two academic paths of "doubting antiquity" and "interpreting antiquity" in the 1920s and 1930s in China have been regarded as representing two different routes of respectively tearing down and rebuilding ancient history.Generally speaking,this view is tenable.However,conceptually the two paths share many related and even identical elements.On the one hand,those scholars who advocated rebuilding ancient history saw the construction of history through a "layering" theory reminiscent of Gu J... |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
