Jobs, Equity, and the Mayoral Administration of Harold Washington in Chicago (1983–87) |
| |
Authors: | Robert Giloth Kari Moe |
| |
Affiliation: | Robert Giloth is senior associate at the Annie E. Casey Foundation and formerly Deputy Commissioner for the Department of Economic Development in Chicago.;Kari Moe currently is a doctoral student in public administration at George Washington University. Previously she was chief of staff for Senator Paul Wellstone and served as assistant to the mayor during the administration of Harold Washington. |
| |
Abstract: | Scholars have applauded and critiqued the "equity" dimensions of the four-year mayoral administration of Harold Washington in Chicago (1983–1987). Much of the debate has centered on haw to assess the progress of equity planning and implementation in specific contexts, whether it has produced concrete outcomes for poor communities, become institutionalized, or changed civic decisionmaking structures. This article attempts to capture the contested and emergent quality of equity planning in the Washington administration by examining its focus on jobs in some detail. The jobs goal–derived from neighborhood experience of economic change–became a central element of Washington's 1983 mayoral campaign and one of the key development goals of the administration. The administration pursued an array of jobs policies and programs, attempting to link economic development with employment services, hold accountable those firms receiving public incentives, retain manufacturing, and provide equitable access to city resources. By the end of Washington's first term, many economic development accomplishments had been achieved but the administration also experienced dilemmas that challenged the jobs goal and its equity potential–for example, the connection between local investment and regional and national economic policies. Consideration of the early experiences of the Washington administration in Chicago in formulating and implementing job policies and programs clarifies the difficulties of a broad-based and sustainable equity program. These lessons are particularly useful today as many low-income advocates, municipalities, and states struggle to reform workforce and economic development systems. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|